Laserfiche WebLink
rule to the personal property (the value of the unit as a whole as opposed to the <br />individual component parts.) In what this writer believes is then an inconsistency, <br />the DOR then subtracts from the entity the pollution control exemption. (The <br />definition of the unit value rule flies in the face of then deducting an individual <br />piece of the entity.) This value is then allocated to the respective host <br />communities. Once that is done, the local assessor places a value on the books <br />for the lands. This is then the estimated market value of the property. <br /> <br />As a regulated industry, any property taxes are made part of the rate base that is <br />approved by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC). The taxes are then "folded <br />into" the rates that are charged the electrical consumer. One of the biggest <br />concerns that some legislators have had is what they perceive as local host <br />communities taking advantage of the "golden goose" and having higher than <br />average tax spending per capita than elsewhere in the state. Please note <br />Sherburne County has never been incorporated into this mix to this writer's <br />knowledge. Their concern is that this lavish spending that they perceive is being <br />passed along to other rate base payors without discretion. The second <br />consternation that some legislators feel has to do with the annexation process of <br />some power plants that have occurred after the siting of the same. For instance, <br />the Red Wing Nuclear Power plant was sited 6 miles out from the city limits. The <br />City then annexed the plant. The same annexation occurred with the Becker <br />(Sherco) power plant. At the time of annexation, the property tax rates in the <br />respective townships were lower than the city spending levels. The spending <br />levels of some host communities and the annexation efforts are two issues that <br />have to be dealt with when addressing the legislators. <br /> <br />What the legislators fail to hear is the following: <br /> · There are inherent disadvantages in hosting power plants. <br /> <br /> For example, the <br />City of Becker has snirt (smog, snow and dirt) that they have to content with <br />in the winter. The Sherco power plant is the biggest belcher of air pollutants <br />in the state of Minnesota. The City of Red Wing gets to deal with the "glow <br />Factor" from the nuclear plants; the County of Sherburne has hundreds of <br />trains per year that run on the tracks. The more train traffic, the higher the <br />incidents of car/train crashes. All host communities have negative impacts <br />with the facilities. Power plants are not considered green industry. <br />That there are significant tax exemptions that the power plants already enjoy. <br />The pollution control exemption, DOE credits, decreasing valuation because <br />of DOR rule changes, an excelerated depreciation schedules, capitalization <br />rates that are not market derived, etc. <br />If the host communities are not given any tax stream from the utilities, then <br />what incentive is there to site additional capacity or new facilities given the <br />negative consequences of the facilities? <br /> <br />The DOR came out with the study recommendation in January 2001 that was <br />recently presented before the House tax Committee. The recommendations are <br />to have the taxes for schools are funded by the state thereby providing utilities <br /> <br /> <br />