My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.2. SR 07-21-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2008
>
07-21-2008
>
5.2. SR 07-21-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2008 3:01:53 PM
Creation date
7/18/2008 9:00:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/21/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: V 08-07 <br />Page 3 <br />AQplicable Regulations <br />Variance Criteria <br />7. Literal en orcement o~the ordinance will cause undue hardship. <br />Christina Simon <br />Literal enforcement will not cause undue hardship as the property already has a viable use (a <br />duplex) on it without a variance. The property can be subdivided without a variance. <br />2. The hardship is caused b~ special conditions and circumstances avhich are peculiar to the ~ro~erty and the <br />structure involved and. which are not characteristic of or applicable to. other lands or structure in the same area. <br />There is no hardship nor special conditions and circumstances. The conditions of the site <br />existedprior to the applicant purchasing the property. The current conditions, lot size and <br />setbacks, meet the zoning requirements. <br />3. The special conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the petitioner's oavn action or inaction. <br />The applicant was aware of the conditions of the site prior to purchasing the property; which is a <br />duplex on a single parcel of land. <br />4. The literal a~lication o~ the provi rion ~- o~ this ordinance avould deprive the petitioner o~rights enioyed by other <br />properties in the same district under the terms o~this ordinance. <br />The property owner is not being deprived of any rights. The property already has a viable use (a <br />duplex) on it without a variance. <br />5. The variance will not be in,~uriouc to or adversel~a~fect the health sae or aa~e~are of the residents of the city or <br />the neighborhood where the property i r located and will be in kee~iing avith spirit and intent of the ordinance. <br />A variance would not be injurious. <br />Action Motion by Sccond by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\Variance\V 08-07 Simon\V 08-07_BA-2.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.