My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.8. SR 02-20-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
02/20/1996
>
6.8. SR 02-20-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:11 AM
Creation date
1/22/2003 9:32:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/20/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to City Council/ZC 96-2 Page 2 <br />February 20, 1996 <br /> <br />business and mini-storage facility are non-conforming uses under the current <br />zoning and will remain non-conforming in the proposed C2 zone. The proposed <br />rezoning should not have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties; it would <br />be compatible with the existing R4 zoning to the west, the proposed R2 zone to <br />the east, the schools to the north and could be considered to be a logical <br />extension of the C2 zone to the south. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Meeting <br /> <br />At the January 23, 1996 Planning Commission meeting, the Commission <br />approved the rezoning request. No one spoke out against the rezoning at the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />It is recommended that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 96- rezoning <br />certain property from R4 (Multi-Family Residential) to C2 (Office District) based <br />on the following: <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />The proposed rezoning will be consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan designation of CB (Central <br />Business). <br /> <br />The proposed rezoning is compatible with the adjacent land uses <br />and zoning. <br /> <br />Se <br /> <br />The property to the south is currently zoned C2 and this would be <br />a logical extension of the zone. <br /> <br />The existing apartment building would not become a non- <br />conforming use in the proposed C2 zone and the non-conforming <br />use status of the trucking business and storage facility would <br />remain unchanged. <br /> <br />s:XplanningXscott\zc96-2cc.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.