Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT A <br />CASE NO V 08-06 FINDINGS OF FACT <br />JUNE 16, 2008 <br />Because all conditions necessary to grant a variance, as outlined in Section 30-635 (b), were <br />addressed, the City Council approved the appeal of variance Case No V 08-06, denied by the <br />Board of Adjustment: <br />1. The hardship is due to the campus setting of the business. <br />2. The site is unique due to its configuration and size; which could not be applied to other <br />businesses. The two signs requested would not be located on a major street. <br />3. No changes to the ordinance have been made that would give the applicant a false <br />understanding of the regulations. <br />4. The property is large, access is greatly separated, and is controlled by one owner, atypical of <br />other properties in the district. <br />5. The signage as proposed reduces traffic confusion and if not permitted, would increase <br />injury potential. The request, if granted, would not adversely impact other properties in the <br />vicinity. <br /> <br />S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\Variance\V 08-06 Scott Powell\Area ID Findings of Fact.doc <br />