Laserfiche WebLink
Case File: V 08-06 <br />Page 3 <br />Elk Rivex Ford <br />Area Identification sign variance <br />5) Approval of the additional sign would not have any impact on health, safety, or welfare of <br />residents in the city. <br />Response <br />Staff has developed draft Finding of Fact for the denial, as suggested by the City Attorney for cases <br />recommended for denial. <br />It should be noted that there are options for highlighting the entrances, such as information/ <br />directional signs, allowed in the current ordinance. <br />Financial Impact -None <br />Attachments <br />^ Staff report to Planning Commission dated June 10, 2008 <br />^ Location Map <br />^ Sign plan and specs <br />^ Sign location map <br />Analysis <br />Should the variance be approved, staff has some concern with the proposed location of the signs. <br />The signs are proposed to be located 10 feet back from the right of way line, and about 1 - 3 feet <br />back of the curb delineating the entrance drives. The right of way setback appears appropriate, and <br />consistent with regulations for other signs. While the ordinance doesn't clearly identify setback <br />requirements, it is recommended that the Board of Adjustments or City Council establish minimum <br />setback requirements fox signs receiving a variance: <br />Vision clearance triangle must be maintained from all streets/ drives <br />Front (Right-of--way): 10 feet <br />Side: 5 feet <br />ACtIOn Motion by Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />S:\PLANNING MAIN\Case Files\Vaxiance\V 08-06 Scott Powell\CC staff report Powell 6-16-08.doc <br />