Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />LJ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Citv of Elk River <br />March l3, 2008 <br />Page 24 <br />GASB Statement No. 49 -,4ccourrtit7g and Financial Reporting for Pollutias Remediation Obligations <br />This statement was issued November 2007 and is effective far periods beginning after December 15, 2007, but liabilities <br />should be measured at the beginning of 11taY period so that beginning net assets can be restated. <br />This standard is intended to ensure that certain cost and Ions-term obligations related to pollution clean up not <br />specifically addressed by current governmental accounting standards will be included in fmancia] reports. The staudards <br />set forth the key circumstances under which a govemment would be required to report a liability related to pollution <br />remediation. A govemment would have to determine whether one or more components of a pollution remediation <br />liability are recognizable if any of the following five obligating events or triggers occurs: <br />• A govennnent is compelled to take remediation action because pollution creates an inuninenT endangerment to the <br />public health or welfare or environment, leaving it little or no discretion to avoid remediation action. <br />• A government is in violation of a pollution prevention-related permit or license. <br />u <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />LJ <br /> <br /> <br />• The government is named, or evidence indicates it will be named, by a regulator that has identified the government <br />as a responsible party ox potentially responsible party for remediation, or as a govemment responsible for sharing <br />costs. <br />• A government is named, or evidence indicates that it will be named, in a lawsuit to compel the govemment to <br />participate in remediation. <br />• A govemment commences or legally obligates itself to commence clean up activities or monitoring or operation and <br />maintenance of the remediation effort. <br />If any ofthe above bullets are meY, the pollution remediation liabilities should be measured at their current value using <br />the expected cash Ilow technique, which measures the liability as a sum ofprobability-weighted amounts in a rattge of <br />possible estimated amounts. Expected recoveries from other responsible parties and from insurers reduce the amount of <br />remediation expense. Statement No. 49 also specifies criteria for capitalization aC some pollution remediation outlays. <br />This statement more closely aligns the financial reporting requirements for pensions with Those for OPEB and, in doing <br />so, enhances information disclosed in notes to financial statements or presented as required supplementary information <br />(RSI) by pension plans and by employers that provide pension benefits. The reporting changes required by this statement <br />amend applicable note disclosure and RSI requirements of Statement No. 2>, FinanciaL Repotting for Defined Benefit <br />Pension Plans and Note Disclosures for Defined Contribution Plans, and No. 27 ,Accounting fox Pensions by State and <br />Local Goverrunental Employers, to conform with requirements of Statement No. 43, Financial Reporting for <br />Postemployment Benefit Plans Other Than Pension Plans, and 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for <br />Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. This statement requires defined benefit pension plans and sole and agent <br />employers present the following information related to cote disclosures: <br />• Notes to financial statements should disclose the funded status of the plan as of the most recent actuarial valuation <br />date. Defined benefit pension plans also should disclose actuarial methods and significant assumptions used in the <br />most recent actuarial valuation in notes to financial statements instead of in notes to RSI. <br />• If the aggregate actuarial cost method is used to determine the annual required contribution of the employer (ARC), <br />notes to financial statements should disclose the funded status of the plan, and a schedule of funding progress should <br />be presented as RSI, using the entry age actuarial cost method. Plans and employers also should disclose that the <br />purpose of doing so is to provide information that serves as a surrogate for the funded status and funding progress of <br />the plan. <br />95?.835.9090 Fax 952.835.3261 <br />www.aemcpus'.cum <br />