My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.10. SR 01-16-1996
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1996
>
01/16/1996 - SPECIAL
>
5.10. SR 01-16-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:09 AM
Creation date
1/8/2003 8:32:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/16/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~FC_ei=Y Council Mi~ <br /> bruary 6, 1989 __/_ ' <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />5~.8. City Engineer Policy for Urban Improvement Projects <br /> The City Engineer submitted a proposal to the Council which would require <br /> urban developers to use the City Engineer in lieu of their own engineer. <br /> He stated that several problems arise by allowing developers to use their <br /> own engineer, some of which are efficiency; coordination of projects; <br /> compliance to City and State laws; less City Staff involvement; overall <br /> scope; and interest conflict. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER KROPUENSKE MOVED TO ADO.Of. RESOLUTION 89-12, A RESOLUTION <br />ADOPTING CERTAIN POLICIES REGARDING ENGINEERING SERVICES. COUNCILMZM~ER <br />DOBEL SECONDED TF.E MOTION. THE MOTION CA~F_D 4-0. <br /> <br />5.9. Central Business District P~verbank Erosion Update <br /> The City Engineer__ indicated that he has,contac a number of <br /> agencies <br /> to <br /> inquire abo~t programs that help fund erosion control projects along <br /> river banks. ~e indicated that the only pro, am that could possibly help <br /> fund an er0sm~n control project is coordinated by the Sewer and Water <br /> Conservation' D~trict. He further indica ed that applications for this <br /> program are due_~Apri!~ 1, 1989. <br /> CO Cz <br /> UN .LP[EP[BER _KRO~UENSKE MOVED TO AU%~HO E %"HE CITY ENGIA~ER TO FOLLOW <br /> UP ON THE PO~SIB_iLI~ OF RECEIVING MONEY RIVERBAk~< EROSION SOLUTIONS. <br /> COUNCILMEMBER SCHULDT SECONDED THE MOTIf THE MOTION CA~ED 4-0. <br /> <br />5.10.Waco Street Bridge <br /> <br />Terry Maurer, City ineer, <br />possibility of future ~iiable fun <br />over the Elk River at Street. <br />be some MSA funding for :his hr: <br />Council that this bridge <br /> <br />~ussion (North ol 10) <br /> <br /> that he has been checking into the <br /> for the construction of a bridge <br /> He stated that there would possibly <br /> e. It was the consensus of the City <br /> <br />COUNCIL~ER DOB~N. MOVED TO <br />COST OF CONSTRUCTING A BP. II <br />COUNC!LMF-U~ER SCHD%DT SECONDED <br /> <br /> THE CITY ENGINEER TO 'INqrESTIGATE THE <br />AT WACO STREET OVER THE ELK RIVER. <br />MOTION. THE MOTION CARP~IED 4-0. <br /> <br />5.11."Dam" Brid~e Uodate <br /> <br /> The City Engineer informe the C~nci! that the Sherburne County <br /> P~storica! Society hal requ~ d ~o qualify the bridge at Main Street and <br /> 0rono Road as a His~oric~ bridge and ~u!d, therefore, like the bridge <br /> preserved. The City Engineer stated ~az the bridge is in very poor <br /> condition and stated tha]/i~ should be jesuit. He indicated he and Phil <br /> Hals, Street Suoerinten~nt, would b~ doing~ome investigation into this <br /> matter and would be ~ontacting the Histo~ica! Society with their <br /> findings. / ~ <br />6.1. Call Special City Council Meetin~ <br /> <br />~ae Ci[y Administrator indicated that due to the agenda being completed <br />at this meeting, there was no need to call for a special Council meening <br />to finish this agenda. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.