Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Appeal aad E gunfization -mut s <br />April 30, 2003 <br />'age <br />Ms. Quinn provided her contact in ormadon to I . and 1\/.-rs. Shepard and they agreed to <br />cal, her for an inspection. It was noted that the inspection must be completed prior to die <br />date the board reconvenes. <br />11. Richard Pool, Parcel Identification Number 7-431-0410 <br />Ms. Quern presented a letter from Mr. Pool appealing his vd e. She stated that she has a <br />appointment with Mr. Pool to review his property, <br />12. David Roseland, Parcel Identification Number 75-405-1810 <br />Mr. Roseland vas present to appeal the proposed market value on his property. Ms. Quinn <br />noted drat access to the property has not been granted. <br />Ms. Quinn provided her contact information and Iv . Roseland agreed to contact herfor an <br />appointment for reassessment. <br />13. Peggy Kaproth, Parcel Identification Number 75-409-0635 <br />Ms. I aproth indicated that des is a vacant lot that she purchased at auction. She stated drat <br />tlhe 4.9%increase in market value is excessive. <br />l,r. Olson explained that he reassessed all of the properties on die niver ,in that area. He <br />adrm'tred, he had trouble th figuring out a land scheme because the lots had been <br />underas s es s ed previous gears . <br />ounce. ber Gumphrey questioned why an increase in value of a property d-lat has been <br />under -assessed is not spread out over a couple years. 1\1r. Olson explained that he cannot <br />ethically spread it out. He noted that die value is not raised simply because it has been <br />underassessed but: because that is what It is worth. <br />Mayor Klinzing questioned if the lot can be rev ewed to evaluate its condition. Mr. Olson <br />indicated he NviU review the proper and report hack to the board at the reconvene meeting. <br />14. Kenneth Dehn, Parcel Identification Number 75-733-0210 and 75-733-021 <br />Nor. I ehn subnu' <br />