My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.14. SR 03-19-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
03/19/2001
>
6.14. SR 03-19-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:08 AM
Creation date
1/2/2003 10:04:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/19/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 of 2 <br />Letter to City of Elk River <br />RE: Precision Tune Auto Care <br /> <br />The owner has decided to provide an interior trash enclosure so that there will be no exterior <br />dumpster therefore no reason in to infringe on the existing berm. <br /> <br />The proposed site identification sign will be moved outside of the drainage easement. <br /> <br />The grading plan has been revised so that no work will be required to the existing berm. <br /> <br />The utility plan is not indicating a new catch basin north of the proposed building; this catch <br />basin is existing. This existing catch basin is connected a catch basin at the West Side of the <br />parking area south of the proposed building. The existing storm line lies under the proposed <br />building location, therefore the civil engineer designed a new storm line with manhole (at the <br />bend) to remove the storm line from below the proposed building location. <br /> <br />There is a small area of parking that drains across the Perkins site. We have sent the owner <br />of the Perkins restaurant the proposed plans and are currently working with them to resolve <br />any issues they may have with these plans. <br /> <br />Additionally you mentioned in a phone conversation that this site did not comply with the <br />landscape criteria in regards to quantity of over-stow trees per the city ordinance for a new stand <br />alone site. In discussing this matter with Mr. Jamie Thelen of the Sand Companies he stated that <br />he believed that as a P.U.D. this site already met the landscape requirements of the city in <br />regards to quantity of trees due to the quantity that was installed when the Country Inn was <br />developed. Could you please research this and let us know what you find prior to the Planning <br />Commission meeting. We may be able to add some trees but we don't think that it is prudent to <br />add trees that will kill other established landscaping (like on the berm), nor add trees in such a <br />manor that they will overcrowd each other when mature. Please advise. <br /> <br />Daniel M. Dege <br /> <br />Scott, I will out of town on the 27th' so Mr. Mark Finnemann will be representing the owner and <br />Finn Daniels at the meeting. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.