My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. & 6.2. SR 03-12-2001
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2001
>
03/12/2001
>
6.1. & 6.2. SR 03-12-2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:08 AM
Creation date
12/30/2002 9:12:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
3/12/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Michele McPherson <br />January 9, 2001 <br />Page Two <br /> <br />submitted, reviewed, and approved. Storm sewer calculations should provide for <br />emergency overflows of each pond and also provide detailed calculations relative to the <br />pdvate ditch which enters the site from the northeast and exits under County Road 13. <br /> <br />There is storm sewer shown behind Lots 1/2 and 3/4 which seems excessive. It appears <br />that this area could be gradually graded so that storm water would flow to a point further <br />west where it could be picked up, minimizing the amount of storm sewer pipe. <br /> <br />There is a storm sewer stub between Buildings 35/36 and 37/38 which collects water in the <br />rear yards. It appears that this storm sewer could be eliminated by grading this area to <br />drain to the east out to the street. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />The two cul-de-sacs on the plan will require either cross-gutters or storm sewer catch <br />basins on either side of the cul-de-sac to collect the water flowing down the street. <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />There is a retaining wall immediately across the street from Buildings 17/18. This wall <br />could be minimized in height by tightening up the proposed contours behind the wall. Aisc, <br />we would suggest the wall be moved further away from the street to provide more room for <br />snow storage. <br /> <br />The next submittal should have the existing contours labeled. Currently, there are no <br />elevations shown on the existing contours which makes it difficult to review the grading <br />plan. <br /> <br />° <br /> <br />The wetland filling and mitigation area will need to be reviewed by Steve Rohlf and the <br />Technical Evaluation Panel if he determines it is necessary. <br /> <br />° <br /> <br />If you have <br /> <br />The major pond in the eastern part of the development has 3:1 contours leading down from <br />the street. An attempt should be made to get a larger, relatively flat area behind the curb <br />and gutter prior to the in-slope into the pond. Currently, the 3:1 slope appears to start <br />almost at the back of curb leading down into the pond. Otherwise, some other method of <br />protecting the street traffic from the pond in-slope will be necessary. <br /> <br />any questions regarding these comments, please call. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Howard R. Green Company <br /> <br />TJM:tw <br /> <br />O:~ROJ,809759J\0240\Ltr 01-09.-01 McP~..~n~?~.rd R, Green Company <br /> <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.