Laserfiche WebLink
on the front. The side elevation is vinyl lap siding on the lower portion and the area within <br />the peak is vinyl shingle style siding. In response to the Commission's comment that the side <br />elevation should consist of different materials, the developer included option B in which the <br />side elevations consist of two materials, brick and vinyl. Option B also included changes to <br />the front elevations making the lower portion entirely brick instead of a mix of brick and <br />stucco and changing the upper floor from stucco to vinyl. Staff feels that both options <br />comply with the ordinance but that option A is preferred. <br /> <br />Rambler Style <br /> <br />The rambler units are also the same style, material and color as those proposed for Trott <br />Brook Farms South. The units meet the minimum width requirements of 24 feet and 28 feet. <br />The units are 32 feet wide. The garages meet the minimum size requirements. The front <br />elevation consists of stucco and brick. The rear elevations are about 1/3 brick, 2/3 vinyl lap <br />siding with decks. The building elevations comply with the ordinance. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Meeting <br /> <br />At the Planning Commission meeting held on January 29th no one spoke at the public <br />hearing. The issue of private drives was discussed. Private drives are not clearly defined in <br />the ordinance. However, there are specific design criteria that private drives must meet, and <br />the drives shown on the plan meet those criteria. The Commission and staff feel that drives <br />servicing the back-to-back units are private drives and not shared driveways. The shared <br />access to the garages are shared driveways. A 30 foot setback from the curb is required for <br />private drives and the plan as proposed does not meet this requirement. The developer <br />argued that the entire drive from the public street to the garages is a shared driveway and not <br />subject to any setback requirement. The Commission talked about why the 30' setback was <br />included in the ordinance. Two reasons came up, to provide open space between buildings <br />and to provide room in the driveway for off street parking. The Commission included a <br />condition in their recommendation that all townhouses meet the 30 foot setback <br />requirement. In response to the Commission's comments, the developer is proposing a 25 <br />foot setback which would be adequate space to park one car in the driveway. Included in the <br />packet is a diagram submitted by the developer showing how cars would fit in the driveway <br />at 22', 25' and 30' setbacks. <br /> <br />The Commission also discussed the rear building elevations of rambler townhouses. They <br />felt that the decks did not provide the required relief on the rear elevations. The developer <br />has revised the rear elevations to provide the needed relief. <br /> <br />The location where Street C meets the south boundary of the plat was discussed. The <br />Commission included a condition in their recommendation that the developer work with the <br />City Engineer on an appropriate location for Street C to exit the plat. <br /> <br /> <br />