Laserfiche WebLink
River <br /> <br />TO: Terry Maurer <br /> <br />FROM: Lori Johnson <br /> <br />DATE: February 7, 2002 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Park Pointe Bonding Request <br /> <br />Cascade I Land Company has requested that the City install the internal public <br />improvements necessary to service the Park Pointe plat and assess the property for the cost <br />of the improvements. I understand that your estimated cost for these improvements is <br />approximately $1,000,000. Before the Council approves financing these improvements, <br />there are several factors to consider. <br /> <br />The Financial Management Plan recently adopted by the Council addresses this issue in two <br />sections. The Plan states, "the City will plan debt to avoid issuing more than $10,000,000 in <br />tax exempt bonds during any calendar year and apply 'bank qualified' status to all issues." <br />The Plan also states, "in most cases, private developers will be responsible for the <br />construction of...systems needed to serve new development. The City may install <br />infrastructure and assess property owners when this approach provides the best alternative." <br /> <br />First, let's address the "bank qualified" issue. In 2002 the City plans to issue bonds for <br />several projects including the public safety and ERMU buildings, Zane Street and 175m <br />Avenue improvements, and equipment certificates for the City and ERMU. The total to be <br />issued is estimated to be almost $10,000,000. Therefore, it is not possible to finance the <br />Park Pointe improvements in 2002 and retain the "bank qualified" status on the City's 2002 <br />bond issues. In fact, it may be necessary to adjust the timing of some of the City's issues. <br />The City may, of course, issue bonds totaling more than $10,000,000 in a year, but they <br />won't be bank qualified. The ability to issue bank qualified bonds is important because the <br />interest rate on bank qualified bonds is slightly lower than the rate on bonds that are not <br />bank qualified. <br /> <br />A similar situation came up several years ago when Guardian Angels wanted the City to issue <br />conduit bonds for a project that put the City over the $10,000,000 limit. The Council agreed <br />to assist Guardian Angels under the condition that Guardian Angels pay the additional <br />interest costs incurred because the bonds were no longer bank qualified. <br /> <br /> <br />