My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 01-28-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
01/28/2002
>
6.2. SR 01-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:04 AM
Creation date
12/17/2002 9:31:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/28/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Draft January 2002) Key Financial Strategies <br /> For Elk River <br /> <br />improvements. Funding plans for each of these projects is needed to <br />make most effective use of revenues and reserves. <br /> <br />The City has created a Pavement Management Program to provide for <br />the reconstruction of the municipal street system. Currently, the <br />Program draws funding from the landfill surcharge, assessments to <br />benefiting properties and general property taxes. Careful planning will <br />be needed to minimize the impacts on property taxes. <br /> <br />It is anticipated that utility reserves and annual revenues will be used to <br />pay for the related costs of street reconstruction projects. Planning for <br />sewer, water and electric system improvements must be coordinated <br />with the Utilities Commission. <br /> <br />The City needs to create a long-term plan for funding construction and <br />maintenance of the storm sewer system. Some money has been set aside <br />in the Storm Sewer Project Fund. The current situation does not provide <br />an ongoing source of revenue or a means of borrowing. If a storm water <br />utility is not acceptable, then the City has three alternatives: (1) <br />establish one or more storm sewer improvement districts; (2) assess 20% <br />or more of the improvement costs to benefited properties; or (3) <br />reallocate other revenues and undertake on a pay-as-you-go basis. <br /> <br />The City needs a long-term plan for funding the acquisition and <br />development of the municipal park system. Monies from park <br />dedication fees and the NSP/RDF Fund are available for this purpose. <br />The City can borrow for this purpose upon obtaining voter approval to <br />issue bonds or proceeding under M.S. Chapter 429 to issue improvement <br />bonds. <br /> <br />Future facility and infrastructure projects increase the potential for <br />capital improvements to compete with the General Fund for limited <br />property tax revenues. Careful planning will help the City meet capital <br />and service needs while managing the tax impacts. <br /> <br />General Fund <br /> <br />The General Fund is the heart of City financial operations. The General Fund <br />finances most non-utility public services. The General Fund produces the <br />largest demand on property taxes. Planning for the General Fund has led to the <br />following key financial strategies: <br /> <br />Personnel and related costs are the largest source of General Fund <br />expense. The addition of staff will be a key to future expenditures. It is <br />anticipated that the City will add a public works employee or police <br />officer every other year to maintain adequate service levels. In the near <br />term, the City has budgeted for additional staffing in cable TV, <br />information management and finance. Planning for these additions and <br />their expense helps to manage the financial implications. <br /> <br />Page <br /> 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.