My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 01-28-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
01/28/2002
>
6.2. SR 01-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:04 AM
Creation date
12/17/2002 9:31:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/28/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Draft January 2002) Key Financial Strategies <br /> For Elk River <br /> <br />KEYS <br /> <br />The financial management planning process in ELk River has been called "Key <br />Financial Strategies". Through this process, several issues areas emerged as key <br />factors for the financial future of ELk River. <br /> <br />Growth and Development <br /> <br />No single factor will influence the future of ELk River more than growth. <br /> <br />· Growth creates property valuation. <br /> Growth adds homes, businesses and institutions that produce the <br /> demand for municipal services and facilities. <br />· The City builds streets, sanitary sewer, water and electric systems <br /> needed to serve new development. <br />· Development creates capital charges and user fees used to support debt <br /> and capital investment for utility systems. <br /> <br />A key financial strategy for the City will be forecasting future growth and <br />understanding the factors that may cause changes in these projections. <br /> <br />State Law controls many elements of city finance. The results of the 200i <br />Legislative Session showed how legislative actions affect city finances and impair <br />long-term planning. <br /> <br />The lack of legislative stability increases the importance of planning. Although it <br />is impossible to predict future statutory constraints, planning forces the City to <br />consider how State Law influences decision-making. It also provides an <br />opportunity to create contingency plans as a buffer to adverse legislative change. <br /> <br />Legislative Action <br /> <br />Property Tax Changes. Given the slowing of the State economy and the <br />extent of past class rate compression, it is difficult to imagine further <br />reductions in tax capacity. In 2001, we were reminded of the speed, <br />magnitude and unpredictability of changes in the property tax system. <br />Forecasts of future property values should use conservativ, e assumptions. <br /> <br />Levy Limits. The current law imposes levy limits for only the next two <br />years. The on again/off again nature of levy limits shows the risk of <br />planning for a future without some form of limitation on the City's <br />ability to levy property taxes. <br /> <br />New Limitations. The Legislature has periodically considered new <br />limitations on the ability of cities to levy taxes or incur debt. The most <br />common form of new limitation is a reverse referendum petition. <br />Residents could petition a city to conduct a referendum on certain <br />matters. <br /> <br />Non-Tax Revenues. The impacts of Legislative change are not limited to <br />property taxes. In 2001, the Legislature reduced HACA, but increased <br />Local Government Aid allocations to Elk River. It is impossible to <br />predict the future of State Aid. The City should anticipate discussions <br /> <br />Page <br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.