My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.2. SR 01-28-2002
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
01/28/2002
>
4.2. SR 01-28-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:03 AM
Creation date
12/17/2002 4:38:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/28/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
indicated that this large rapid turn over in personnel, coupled with the differential in pay <br />between Elk River and other nearby communities, will cause them to look for employment <br />elsewhere. <br /> <br />The City of Elk River is perilou~ly close to having a major turnover in its Building <br />Department at a time when construction is at its highest levels in the communities' history. <br />Building inspection is as much health/safety as though the inspectors had lights and sirens <br />on their vehicles. It would be irresponsible for the City of Elk River to collect building <br />permit fees and not provide quality and timely service. <br /> <br />I feel an adequate case for increasing the inspector's wages has been made. I also feel there <br />is a case to be made that an increase in their pay is legitimate as far as comparable worth. <br />The Building Official's duties were distributed amongst the inspectors when he left. The <br />city's Lead Inspector is now doing the commercial plan checks and aiding on a daily basis <br />with the supervision of the Department. The other building inspectors are now inspecting <br />commercial buildings, whereas before they were strictly residential inspectors. The new <br />responsibility of commercial inspection requires additional expertise in construction <br />practices and applications, additional communication skills (hosting meetings with architects <br />and engineers) and a more in depth knowledge of the building code. I believe that these are <br />all issues that raise the Building Official's point ranking as far as comparable worth. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> ~ I recommend that city increase the pay all inspector positions immediately by $3,000 <br /> per year. ,., <br /> <br />I recommend the city considered the create a new non-exempt pay grade 15 and that <br />the Lead Inspector and Plumbing/Mechanical Inspector move from their current <br />ranking at pay grade 14 to the new pay grade 15. <br /> <br />I recommend the city consider moving the Building Inspectors from pay grade 13 to <br />pay grade 14 and that they stay within their current step so it results in an immediate <br />pay increase. On the city's pay scale, each higher pay grade is approximately $2,500 <br />more per year. The increased wages for the Building Inspectors would make their <br />new maximum pay $51,563. This increase will still leave Elk River's Building <br />Inspectors below the average for the group 6 cities, which is $51,882. I would like <br />to do more, if possible. " <br /> <br />To pay for this increase, I am proposing to eliminate the vacant inspector position. <br />This position was meant to off-set the lose of the Building Official, who's salary was <br />approximately $59,000 per year. I know that the anticipated workload can be better <br />handled with one less inspector than it can with a full compliment of inspectors with <br />less experience. I would like to keep open the option of hiring seasonal help, if <br />construction activity is higher than expected. Even if seasonal help is hired, this <br />scenario will still be a sig..nificant savings for the city. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.