5.1. SR 01-22-2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

JAN-I?-2OOZ IO:~3AM FROIVI-ERMU 763-441-8099 T-204 P.002/003 F-711 Page 2 Regular meeting of the Elk River Municipal Utilities Commission January 15, 2002 James Tralle notes that the Utilities have been consistent with all other facilities, with special noting of the Elk River Public Schools. Pat Klaers said the metropolitan council is used as a guide, rather than a rule. John Dietz asked if schools and churches are charged differently for WAC and SAC charges; Bryan Adams replying no. James Tralle moved to deny the request from Christian Missionary Alliance for reduction of the WAC charges billed August 31, 2001. John Dietz seconded the motion. George Zabee asked for further discussion, and states that he wants to stay consistent, but if the City would change its mind on the refunding of SAC charges, the Utility would again look at the issue. Motion carried 3-0. 5,4 Revie~ LFG Contracts Bryan Adams updated the Commission on the landfill gas to electric generation project. Ron Black appeared to review the following documents: a. Ch-ant of Easement b. Gas Purchase Contract c. Service Agreement d. Security Agreement/Promissory Note James Tralle asked if there are red flags in the documents that should be discussed. Ron Black and Bryan Adams responded witl~ possible scenarios that could occur, and the question of the quality of gas at a future time. George Zabee asked about an oversight committee. James Tralle noted that he feels the LFO project is an excellent conservation tool. By consensus, the Commission desires to continue with the project. 5.3 Review & Consider CIP Spending Options. In review, the Minnesota Energy Security & Reliability Act enacted in 2001 requires municipal utilities to spend 1.5% of gross electric revenues on Conservation Improvement Programs (CIP). Compliance is required by June, 2003. Vance Zehringer presented a list of possible programs. Vance Zehringer, and Bryan Adam~ ranked the desirability of the proposed programs, and explained the list to the Commission. Maximizing benefit to customers, while minimizing shaft time is important, stressing the need to focus on a few of the programs, rather than the entire list. Staffwas directed to return with fewer choices for spending the needed amount of money. 5.1 Update Subst~t. tion North Bryan Adams reviewed and updated the proposal phase for Substation North. He further proposed that ERMU will be the general contractor for the project. The Commission concurred.