Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />March 7, 2002 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />users come on line in the beginning. When the volume of water being used is <br />Iow and the line is a dead-end with little or no circulation, the Water Utility tends <br />to get water quality complaints. These can be remedied if they occur by simply <br />flushing the watermain through one of the hydrants in the development. The final <br />concern would be fire-fighting capabilities should a watermain break occur or on <br />the extreme dead-end portion of the watermain system. This should pose a <br />relatively small problem since the fire department can easily fight a residential fire <br />in an area that has no water service. <br /> <br />Staff's conclusion in our discussion relative to the Developer's desire not to fund any <br />water improvements on 175th Avenue is that there are three options. They are as <br />follows: <br /> <br />Proceed with the water improvements under 175th Avenue from Tyler to Park <br />Pointe Addition, requiring the Developer to pay for these improvements. The <br />Developer would pay for the lateral equivalent with trunk oversizing funded by the <br />City. <br /> <br />Eliminate the detached trail on the north side of the 175th Avenue improvement, <br />not install the watermain at this time, and wait until there is demand for water <br />service from the properties abutting 175th Avenue on either the north or the <br />south. The watermain could be easily installed in the future in the corridor left <br />vacant by the elimination of the detached trail without damaging the newly <br />constructed road surface. The difficulty would be in extending water services <br />under 175th Avenue to service the south side of the road. These would have to <br />be directionally bored under the road at a slightly higher cost than if they were <br />constructed with the road project. <br /> <br />The watermain could be installed as discussed with the road improvement, but <br />not have the Developer of Park Pointe Addition pay for the improvements. We <br />would recommend that if this option is chosen, the Elk River Municipal Utilities be <br />asked to fund the improvement until such time as the abutting properties can be <br />assessed for water service, and they would be reimbursed for their expenditure. <br />This is similar to the trunk watermain construction planned in 2002 from Kliever <br />Lake Fields to the new water tower site in Eagles Marsh. <br /> <br />In discussing the need for the water line under 175th Avenue with Bryan Adams, relative <br />to the benefit of the overall water system, he indicated that he is concerned about future <br />developments such as Elk River Station and the ability to provide large quantities of <br />water for peak domestic demand and fire fighting needs. Without the loop from Park <br />Pointe to Tyler Street, essentially large quantities of water contained in the new water <br />tower will have to flow northerly to CSAH 12, then along through Trott Brook Farms to <br />Tyler Street and south along Tyler Street to the area of Elk River Crossing, rather than <br />coming out of the water tower to Park Pointe down 175th Avenue, which is a much <br />shorter route to the area of the Elk River Station development. If the City Council <br />chooses option "b" described above, then the watermain becomes an Elk River <br />Municipal Utilities issue if they desire it to be included in the 175th Avenue <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Ltr 3-6-02 Council <br /> <br />Howard R, Green Oompany <br /> QQNSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> <br /> <br />