Laserfiche WebLink
Ikiver <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and Council <br /> <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br /> <br />Pat Klaers, City Admi~r~.~ <br />April 15, 2002 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Consider School District Request for Community Recreation <br /> Reimbursement <br /> <br />As everyone knows, the school district believes it is due funds for community recreation <br />activities over the last nine years or so. Since the organization is/has dissolved, it is now <br />appropriate for the school district reimbursement to be considered. <br /> <br />Most everyone involved in the organization is reasonably comfortable with the revenue <br />figures over the past nine years. However, there has been a fair amount of discussion over <br />the accuracy of the expenditures. Issues complicating the situation include the fact that the <br />cities and school districts are on two different fiscal years and that there is a gap between <br />when revenues are received and expenditures occurred for recreation programs. The school <br />auditor spent some time to restate the previous years expenditures and put them into a <br />calendar year format so that we could identify when the shortages were incurred. A great <br />deal of time has been spent by the school auditor and by community recreation employees to <br />analyze 2000 expenditures and revenues. In the end, it was deemed that the figures for <br />revenues and expenditures for 2000 were accurate. It would take a significant amount of <br />additional school auditor and city time to analyze expenditures for each year to see if <br />everything is true and accurate; and in the end we may never reach a consensus on the exact <br />amount due to the school district. If it is assumed that the accounting is correct, then the <br />school (community education) is coming up short financially. <br /> <br />It is my belief that the money paid by municipalities for the administration of the community <br />recreation organization came pretty close to coveting expenses. Accordingly, I also believe <br />the shortage that occurred over the past nine years relates mostly to recreation programs. Elk <br />River (and most municipalities) subsidize some recreation programs to make sure they were <br />affordable. If there is a shortage in the recreation programming aspect of the community <br />recreation operation, it means that the subsidy required is more than what was paid. Elk <br />River did a significant amount of programming over the last nine years and, if money is due <br />to the school district, then Elk River has an obligation to repay these funds. <br /> <br /> <br />