My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.7. SR 12-16-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
12/16/2002
>
4.7. SR 12-16-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:32:00 AM
Creation date
12/13/2002 7:55:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/16/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Individual Officer Sidearm: Purchased by each individual officer via their annual uniform <br />allowance. Department provides practice ammunition and duty ammunition each year. The <br />weapon is used for personal protection and close quarter combat situations the officer may <br />encounter while on-duty. <br /> <br />Beretta 12 ga. Model 1201FP Shotgun: Department weapon. Uses either 00 buck or slug, <br />used for medium distances or shots up to 100 yards. Used in situations involving multiple <br />suspects or situations where a slug offers greater penetration. Requires significant training <br />for patrol officers - most choose not to use the weapon due to significant recoil issues. <br />Cannot be used where there is concern that 00 buck rounds might miss part of the intended <br />target. Being eliminated by many departments as a liability. <br /> <br />H & K MP-5 Sub-machine Gun: Department weapon. Uses 9mm pistol round. Utilizes <br />either a 15 or a 30 round magazine offering high capacity and rapid cyclic rate of fire. Can be <br />fired in semi-automatic mode, burst mode or fully automatic. Offers range of up to 100 <br />yards but is best suited for close quarter entry - specifically SWAT work or perimeter details. <br />Very limited in range - although classified as a rifle, it is not accurate beyond 100 yards and <br />has no penetration power at long distances. Very expensive to purchase and maintain. Our <br />current inventory is between 10-17 years old and will need to be replaced at a cost of $1,854 <br />per weapon. <br /> <br />Colt or DPMS AR-15 or A-15 Rifle: Department weapon. Uses a .223 caliber round and <br />has a 20 round magazine. Can be used close quarters or at great distances. Utilizes a <br />collapsible stock to make the weapon multi-faceted for a variety of applications. Will work in <br />all department applications and requires less training than most long arms for patrol use. <br />Weapon has a stock that works in four different positions accommodating different sized <br />officers. Weapon price is $980.20 a weapon, or half the cost of an MP-5. We currently have <br />four of these weapons in our inventory. <br /> <br />Advantages to unifying our weapon inventory: We are suggesting that we go to one <br />standard shoulder fired weapon for use by all officers. This would eliminate the need to <br />replace the expensive MP-5's as they wear out as well as having to supply the large amount <br />of ammun/fion needed to train on that weapon. We would in fact be able to train each year <br />by buying only the handgun and ARq 5 ammunition needed to train on these two weapons <br />systems. Although SWAT would still need to train on the variety of weapons that they have, <br />we would decrease significantly the types of ammunition needed for patrol training each <br />year. <br /> <br />The simplification in our inventory also encourages our officers to be more proficient in the <br />weapons that they carry. It is much easier to train officers with their sidearm and one <br />shoulder fired weapon, versus training with the sidearm and three shoulder frred weapons. <br />The department firmly believes that in our current litigious surroundings, that we are better <br />apt to defend claims against the City when we can establish proof that our officers are highly <br />proficient with their weapons systems versus merely stating that we were able to qualify <br />them with the variety of weapons once a year. Having to train with just one shoulder fired <br />weapon will allow us to concentrate more thoroughly to insure that each officer is highly <br />skilled in the operation and deployment of the weapons that they are responsible for. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.