My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.5. SR 11-18-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
11/18/2002
>
4.5. SR 11-18-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:31:58 AM
Creation date
11/15/2002 9:25:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/18/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes <br />June 10, 2002 <br /> <br />5.2. Request by the City, of Elk River for Ordinance Amendment Section 900 - Regarding <br /> Building Permit Escrows Requirements - P.H. <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Building and Zoning Administrator Steve Rohlf requested Council to consider an ordinance <br />amendment that would require an escrow of a maximum of 50% of the value of the <br />unfinished landscaping when a C.O. is requested. <br /> <br />Mayor Klinzing opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Tom Bakritges, representing D.R. Horton reviewed the issues in his letter to the Mayor and <br />City Council on June 4, 2002. He noted that D.R. Horton would prefer that escrow be done <br />through the City and not a title company, bank, or other financial institution as it would <br />hold up closings and financial and title company processes and could be a hindrance to <br />future homeowners. He stated that he would prefer to see the escrow at the time of <br />building permit issuance. <br /> <br />There being no further comments, Mayor Klinzing closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER MOTIN MOVED TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 02-11 <br />AMENDING SECTIONS 900.30 AND 900.38 OF THE CITY CODE OF <br />ORDINANCES - CASE NO. OA 02-02B WITH THE DELETION OF THE <br />WORD "ONLY" IN SECTION 900.38 2 (B). THE MOTION CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />5.3. Consider Hiring Environmental Technician <br /> <br />Building and Zoning Administrator Steve Rohlf requested authorization to advertise for an <br />Environmental Assistant. Steve reviewed the proposed duties for this position. <br /> <br />COUNCILMEMBER TVEITE MOVED TO AUTHORIZE STAFF TO <br />ADVERTSIE FOR THE POSITION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANT. <br />COUNCILMEMBER KUESTER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />Liquor and Tobacco Fees <br /> <br />The City Clerk indicated that the Council previously requested Staff to research the city's <br />existing liquor and tobacco fees to see if expenses are being recovered. The City Clerk <br />indicated that she compiled information in a survey from other cities regarding tobacco and <br />liquor fees. <br /> <br />The City Clerk noted that of those surveyed, the approximate average charged for tobacco <br />licenses is $160 compared to Elk River's fee of $100. She noted that based on the cost of <br />enforcement and administration, the fees could be increased in the City of Elk River. <br /> <br />The City Clerk noted that according to the survey, Elk River's liquor fees are also quite a bit <br />lower than the average. She indicated that the on-sale liquor fees have not been increased for <br />at least 20 years. She also noted that after reviewing the police reports, it is evident that there <br />is an increase in demand on law enforcement due to liquor licenses. <br /> <br />The Clerk indicated that if the Council wants to consider increasing the license fees, it would <br />be best to coordinate the increase with the resolution considering the fee schedule at the end <br />of the year so that new license fees are in place at the beginning of 2003. She also noted that <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.