My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.4. SR 04-22-2002
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2002
>
04/22/2002
>
5.4. SR 04-22-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:31:56 AM
Creation date
10/1/2002 3:37:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/22/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
evaluate the appearance concerns and the cost issues related to the life of the materials. The <br />cedar shake shingle is not being proposed as a bid alternate due to both its cost and longevity. <br /> <br />The mechanical/electrical consultant for the project needs an additional two weeks to <br />complete the design work. This is due to the late decision on the geothermal component of <br />the project. The decision was delayed as additional information on the cost/benefit and <br />maintenance were obtained and analyzed. The additional two weeks will not have a significant <br />impact relative to the good bidding environment we are currently seeing. The additional two <br />weeks will allow us to not disrupt the City Hall site until after the fourth of July and County <br />Fair celebrations. Additionally, we will delay work on Orono Parkway until after the County <br />Fair. The schedule calls for the City to go out for bids for the projects in mid to late May, to <br />receive the bids on June 7, and have them considered by the Council on June 17. <br /> <br />Security of the expanded City Hall and Utilities facility has been discussed and there are <br />concerns. Staff and the consultants are looking at gates in order to secure part of the building <br />while still having exit doors available for emergencies. Also staff needs to look at our building <br />maintenance and cleaning program. In this regard, it may make sense to have building cleaning <br />take place in the evening and therefore we would have a person on staff at night in order to <br />lock doors and check to see if the building is secured. Security is an issue regardless if it's a <br />City Council meeting, School Board meeting, or public groups using our large meeting rooms. <br />Currently the Training Room is available for the public's use. The current proposal is to not <br />have any of the meeting rooms available for the public after normal work hours. The public <br />can still use our meeting room space during the workday but we have not worked out all the <br />issues yet in order to feel comfortable about having the public use the meeting rooms with no <br />city staff members also being at City Hall. I have checked the reservation log for the Training <br />Room and there have been very few public uses of our space after the workday. There were <br />18 such occurrences in 2001. Now we have additional meeting room space at the Lion's Park <br />Center so hopefully this space would be available for these meetings. <br /> <br />Utilities General Manager Bryan Adams and I have discussed our building budgets and the <br />possibility of not charging each other SAC and WAC fees for the construction projects. From <br />the project funding point of view this makes sense. Also, the SAC and WAC fees go to help <br />finance sewer/water infrastructure and not operating expenses. <br /> <br />Our existing flat roof was not designed correctly, it does not function correctly and the <br />material is deteriorating and is no longer under warranty. It is everyone's recommendation at <br />the committee level that this roof needs to be fixed and replaced. The cost is not in the <br />original budget estimate for the City Hall remodeling/expansion project although the budget <br />for this building has always been more flexible than the Public Safety Facility budget. The <br />estimate for a new roof is $135,000 and this will maybe require the project to exceed the <br />amount of monies available in the reserves until shortly after the project is completed. If this <br />happens, the City will have to find funds internally until the reserves are built up again later in <br />2004. <br /> <br />As noted in the previous paragraph, the City is much more concerned about the budget for <br />the public safety facility than we are for about the budget for the City hall project. This is <br />because of the bond that is being issued for the public safety facility has an $8 million dollar <br />cap. Two things have happened since the $8 million dollar amount has been established Oust <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.