Laserfiche WebLink
League of Minnesota Cities 2008 Transportation Funding Policy Statement <br />Issue: The League of Minnesota Cities recognizes that all Minnesota residents and businesses <br />benefit from a sound transportation system that offers diverse modes of travel. Current funding for <br />roads, bridges and transit systems across all government levels in the state is inadequate, and <br />Minnesota's transportation system is failing to meet needs pertaining to public safety, population <br />growth and economic development. <br />Due to funding challenges, the state has delayed regionally significant road construction and <br />reconstruction projects. Urban areas are experiencing growing congestion and are lagging behind <br />other regions in making transit investments. Rural roads are not being upgraded to meet modern <br />safety standards and are not serving the needs of industries that depend on the ability to transport <br />heavy loads. <br />Local roads, bridges, sidewalks and trails are critical components of Minnesota's transportation <br />infrastructure. Cities, like the state, have inadequate resources to preserve and reconstruct aging <br />transportation infrastructure, and to build transportation infrastructure to serve new development. <br />Existing funding mechanisms such as municipal state aid (MSA), special assessments and bonding <br />have limited applications, making it difficult for cities to address growing needs. <br />Further, as the state funding shortfall has grown, the trunk highway project cost participation <br />requirements imposed on local units of government have increased dramatically. This burden has <br />been exacerbated by the state's use of trunk highway bonds as a funding source, because under <br />Minnesota's constitution, trunk highway bond dollars cannot be spent on local components of trunk <br />highway projects, and the bond dollars are not distributed through the Highway User Tax <br />Distribution Fund formula. Cost participation requirements put added pressure on local budgets, <br />contribute to property tax increases and divert local resources from the over 39,000 lane miles in <br />Minnesota under municipal jurisdiction. <br />Response: More resources must be dedicated to all components of the state's transportation <br />system, and local units of government must have access to resources and funding tools to <br />meet growing needs. The League of Minnesota Cities supports the following: <br />• acceleration of the phase-in of the constitutional dedication of 100 percent of the <br />motor vehicle sales tax (MUST) to transportation purposes; <br />• MVST distribution of 60 percent for roads and bridges, and 40 percent for transit; <br />• dedication of the sales tax on leased vehicles to transportation purposes; <br />• a permanent increase in the gas tax; <br />• indexing of the gas tax, provided there is a limit on how much the tax can be <br />increased for inflation in a given amount of time; <br />• increases in vehicle registration taxes (tab fees); <br />• trunk highway bonding, provided the Legislature implements reasonable restrictions <br />on the amount of debt service the state will incur, and provided the Legislature <br />appropriates funding to assist with local costs related to projects funded with trunk <br />highway bonds; <br />• general obligation bonding for local roads and bridges, particularly for routes of <br />regional significance; <br />• a sales tax increase to fund transportation needs; <br />S:\Council\Lori\2008\League Resolution Requesting Comprehensive Road and Transit Funding.doc <br />