My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2006 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
08-08-2006 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2008 4:11:46 PM
Creation date
2/11/2008 4:08:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
8/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 <br />August 8, 2006 <br />--------------------------- <br />He stated that when the wind is from the south or north, he cannot even open his windows. <br />He stated there is activity on the site until 9 or 10 p.m. and there are lights all over the site. <br />Commissioner Offerman asked where the smell was coming from. Mr. Ladd stated that the <br />smell is from the asphalt plant on 221 Avenue. He questioned who would want to buy <br />their property with the stench of the asphalt plant so close by. He stated that the dust issue <br />also needs to be addressed. <br />There being no further public comment, Chair Lemke closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Ropp stated that he would not be able to recommend approval of the <br />request, since the applicant is not able to provide information regarding the number of <br />trucks currently running at the site, future projections of the number of trucks, and how long <br />the asphalt plant would be in operation. He felt an interim use permit of 2 - 5 years could <br />be considered. He felt there are too many unknowns, and was concerned about allowing a <br />24-hour operation. Commissioner Ropp stated he felt traffic onto Highway 169 was a <br />serious concern, and that approving the request would not be in the best interest of those <br />who use Highway 169. <br />Commissioner Westgaard stated that he was not in favor of the request, and had a concern <br />that half of the property was zoned residential and half was zoned for mining. He stated <br />that approval of this request would allow them to continue to run the asphalt plant after the <br />mineral excavation ceased. He expressed concern for increased traffic and that proper <br />acceleration lanes need to be looked at. He stated he would rather see the request processed <br />as an interim use with the condition that when the mineral excavation ceases, the asphalt <br />plant would also cease operation. He concurred with Commissioner Ropp's comments. <br />Commissioner Offerman stated that he concurred with Commissioners Westgaard and <br />Ropp. He stated that considerable improvements were made to Highway 169 in Livonia <br />Township. He stated that he realized this was an amendment to an existing conditional use <br />permit, but the request provides the City an opportunity to address issues related to the <br />overall operation. He stated he agreed that the use should be an interim use with a sunset <br />date of perhaps 10 years, and that if the operation ceases for one year, it would no longer be <br />allowed. He stated he cannot support the request as presented. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that he felt the 221 Avenue location was more suitable <br />since the proper acceleration lanes were in place. He stated had the same concerns as <br />Commissioners Westgaard, Ropp and Offerman. He felt approval of the asphalt plant <br />would take the operation from dusty and loud, to dusty, loud, and stinky. He stated he could <br />understand the cost savings of having the plant closer to the job sites. He stated there are <br />traffic stacking issues, intersection issues and that he would like to see input from MnDOT <br />on this location. He felt it was obvious that the operation would add to the truck traffic. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that it seems like the right thing to do from a road <br />construction standpoint, but that the issues need to be thought through. He stated that he <br />would like to see a defined reclamation plan. Also, he stated he was not in favor of the 24- <br />hour operation request and felt the request should be reviewed as an interim use and could <br />not support it as is. <br />Commissioner Scott stated that he could see that the 24-hour operation would benefit the <br />community it some ways. He was in agreement that there are open issues and that he could <br />support a recommendation to either table or deny the request. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.