My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-08-2006 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2006
>
08-08-2006 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2008 4:11:46 PM
Creation date
2/11/2008 4:08:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
8/8/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Minutes <br />August 8, 2006 <br />Page 2 <br />--------------------------- <br />Commissioner Offerman asked how many years the operation is expected to last. Ms. Haug <br />stated that depends on how long it is needed, since the will be supplying materials for state, <br />city, and township projects. Commissioner Offerman stated he was concerned that a <br />conditional use permit could remain with the property, and a subsequent owner could open <br />another asphalt plant.. He asked for clarification on an interim use permit versus a <br />conditional use permit. Planning Manger Jeremy Barnhart explained that an interim use <br />permit would have an end date, and that a new owner would have to meet all the terms of <br />the original conditional use permit. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that he shared Commissioner Offerman's concerns, and felt <br />that the permit should have a "sunset" date. Commissioner Anderson questioned language <br />in the Agreement regarding use of County Road 33 to access Highway 169. Ms. Haug stated <br />that language was included in error and would be removed. Commissioner Anderson asked <br />if there were acceleration lanes for the trucks at 225th Avenue. Ms. Haug stated that the <br />appropriate access, turn, and acceleration lanes were in place. She stated that she had <br />received no comments from MnDOT regarding this request. <br />Chair Lemke stated that he recalled past discussion regarding a possible private drive <br />agreement with the property owner to the south. Ms. Haug stated that Elk River <br />Bituminous is no longer in operation. Chair Lemke asked what the timeline in the 1994 EIS <br />was for completion of the mining operation at this site. Ms. Haug stated that she would <br />need to research his question. Chair Lemke stated he would support an interim use for this <br />request. <br />Commissioner Offerman stated he agreed this request should be an interim use. <br />Chair Lemke opened the public hearing. <br />Jeff Lawson, 22715 Baldwin St NW -Stated that the 1994 EIS states that the entire 280 <br />acres of the Toth property would be reclaimed by 2011. He stated it was his understanding <br />that all of the property owned by Bauerly Brothers as already been mined. Mr..Lawson <br />stated that the asphalt plant will be directly across from his home. He asked if the City was <br />working with Livonia Township on a plan for the 169 corridor. He noted that the Schulz <br />property is not part of the 1994 EIS and questioned what will happen with the truck traffic <br />when that site is mined. He expressed concern for the wetlands on the Toth property and <br />runoff. Mr. Lawson stated that even though the mining hours are 7 am - 7 pm, he can hear <br />the backup alarms at 5:45 am. He questioned why another asphalt plant is needed, since <br />there are already two other plants in close proximity. Mr. Lawson stated he felt Livonia <br />Township placed the 20-acre moratorium on development to preserve the area for future <br />mining, and that this will force property owners to given up their land to the gravel miners at <br />wholesale prices. He stated that muting virtually destroys all wildlife habitat. He noted that <br />the Hohlen farms is completely torn up. Mr. Lawson stated that he heard an overpass is <br />planned at 221~t Avenue and Highway 169. He stated that land owners are being held <br />hostage by the "big money", and that the County is protecting the gravel for them. <br />Mr. Lawson stated that in the original conditional use permit for the property, the applicant <br />requested 24-hour rock crushing operations. At that time, the Zoning Administrator stated <br />that did not have the resources to monitor all the mining, asphalt and trucking operations. <br />Mr. Lawson stated that he has counted 31 trucks coming in and out of the site in one-half <br />hour. He stated that there is no acceleration lane going southbound on Highway 169. He <br />noted that the 221~t Avenue and Highway 169 intersection does have the proper lanes, but <br />not 225th Avenue. He noted that the gravel mining should have been completed on the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.