My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. PCSR 06-12-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2007
>
06-12-2007
>
5.1. PCSR 06-12-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2008 3:48:23 PM
Creation date
2/11/2008 10:31:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
6/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: OA 07-07 <br />Page 2 <br />Attachments <br />• Location Map <br />• Applicant's Narrative <br />• Site Plan <br />• Building Sketches <br />• Section 30-1294 BP Business Park District ordinance <br />General Information <br />Ordinance Amendment <br />Alliance Machine <br />Applicant Alliance Machine <br />60 Day Rule The application has been deemed complete as of May 10, 2007. <br />The City must take action by June 30, 2007 <br />Requested Action Ordinance Amendment <br />Location and Size All Business Park zoning districts <br />Overview <br />The applicant would like to construct an accessory structure for storage of certified material. <br />Attached to this structure would be a dumpster enclosure which is required by the City. They have <br />indicated the structure would be built of the same materials as the existing building, which does meet <br />the design guidelines for the district. <br />The storage of certified material does not have to be in a separate structure. With the applicant's <br />specific property, they want to build a detached structure, verses an attached structure, so they can <br />expand the size of our current building when needed in the future. Their hope is this will occur in <br />5-10 years. If they attach the new structure to the current building, it will block emergency vehicle <br />access to the back of their building, which they built per the City's request specifically for emergency <br />vehicle access. <br />Although it is clear why the applicant wants to pursue an Ordinance Amendment, the specifics of <br />the Ordinance Amendment are vague. There is no proposal on allowable sizes fox accessory <br />structures or whether they would have design guidelines. Also, would they be permitted uses or <br />require a Conditional Use Permit? <br />Recommendation <br />The request, as presented by the applicant, is open ended in what would be allowed for sizes and <br />design guidelines. Staff would recommend denial of the request, as presented. <br />Should the Planning Commission feel accessory structures are appropriate, staff would recommend: <br />1. The maximum size allowed for accessory structures be limited to 1,200 square feet <br />per property. <br />S:\PI,ANNING\Case Files\OA\OA 07-07 Alliance Machine Request\OA 07-07_PC.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.