5.2. PCSR 07-10-2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Case File: CU 07-18 Page 3 Waste Management Conditional Use Permit 7. Will not endanger, injure or detrimentally affect the use and enjoyment of other propery in the immediate vicinity or the public health, safety, morals, comfort, convenience orgeneral welfare of the neighborhood or the city. 2. Widl be consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding vacant proper y. 4. Will be served adequately by and ufill not adversely affect essential public facilities and services including streets, police and fire protection, drainage, refuse disposal, avater and se2ver systems, parks and schools; and will not, in particular, create traffic congestion or interference with trafizc on adjacent and neighboring public thoroughfares S. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons or propery because of excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, dust or vibrations 6. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. 7. Will fully comply uJith all other requirements of this Code, including any applicable requirements and standards for the issuance of a license or permit to establish and operate the proposed use in the city. If denial of such a permit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section 30-654. In the review of the standards for CUP as outlined, it appears that the request is consistent with all of these standards. Analysis The land use is consistent with the land use plan, and the pattern of development in that area. The need for service and office buildings is customary to the use. The area of potential discussion is that an attempt was made with the previous approval to create a `campus'; an area of cohesive buildings in both design and materials. The new building was to be concrete, and match the texture of the gas plant. It could be suggested that the new addition and the existing building, if its determined that it is appropriate to keep be made to match this texture as well. From another viewpoint, the addition on the north side is not visible from the adjacent street, only from patrons to the land fill. The existing building is sighted prominently on the site, in front of the recently approved building. The Building department, in their review, has raised some issues, including the need to complete the CO on the recently approved building, and the drawing of the plans by a licensed architect. The Fire Chief has suggested a meeting to fully understand the Fire Code requirements. Comprehensive Plan The use of the land is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C:\Documents and Settings\jjohnson\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK49\Waste management staff report to PC 7-IO.doc