My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5. PCSR 08-14-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Packets
>
2006-2010
>
2007
>
08-14-2007
>
5.5. PCSR 08-14-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2008 3:44:05 PM
Creation date
2/1/2008 2:19:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCSR
date
8/14/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: CU 07-23 <br />Page 3 <br />PS llancc <br />Pat Briggs- and Pam Sitts <br />4. lYlill be served adequately by and will not adversely affect essential public facilities and services including <br />streets, police and fire protection, drainage, refuse disposal, water and sewer ystems, parks and schools; and <br />mill not, in particular, create tra~c congestion or interference with tra~c on adjacent and neighboring public <br />thoroughfares. <br />5. lYlill not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be <br />detrimental to any persons or property because of excessive tra~c, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, odors, dust or <br />vibrations. <br />6. lYlill not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. <br />7. Dill fully comply with all other requirements of this Code, including any applicable requirements and <br />standards for the issuance of a license or permit to establish and operate the proposed use in the czty. <br />If denial of such a permit should occur, it shall accompany recommendations or determinations by <br />findings or a report stating how the proposed use does not comply with the standards set forth in Section <br />30-654. <br />Based on the review of the standards, it appears the use will be consistent with most, although the <br />consistency with the comprehensive plan could be open for discussion. <br />Analysis <br />The applicant is requesting an interim use permit fox 5 years, to December 31, 2012. This is inconsistent <br />with other IUP's, where the city has typically allowed only three years. The challenge at the end of the <br />term, whichever term that is, will be to convince is viable business that they need to relocate. <br />Respectfully Submitted <br />Jeremy Barnhart, AICP <br />Planning Manager <br />Action Motion by Second by Vote <br />Follow Up <br />S:APLANNING\Case Files\CUP\CU 07-23 YS Dance\CU 07-23_PC.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.