My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4. BASR 06-12-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Board of Adjustments
>
BOA Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
06-12-2007
>
4. BASR 06-12-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2008 9:36:25 AM
Creation date
1/25/2008 10:51:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
BASR
date
6/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case File: V 07-04 <br />Page 3 <br />Variance <br />Jeff Bicl;man <br />The existing garage does not meet the city's requirement of having a garage at least 440 sgft in size <br />and without a front yard variance, the property could not support a new garage to meet this <br />minimum requirement. <br />During the staff site plan review, it was indicated that the applicant would also need a variance for <br />the amount of impervious surface being proposed. The memo from the Environmental <br />Administrator outlines this. <br />Applicable Regulations <br />Variance Criteria <br />7. Literal enforcement of the ordinance will cause undue hardship. <br />Literal enforcement would not allow a functional new structure or one that would meet the city's <br />minimum requirements of square footage. <br />2. The hardship is caused by .r~eczal conditions and circumstances which are~eculiar to the~irot~erty and the <br />structure involved and which are not characteristic o~ or a~i~ilicable to other lands or structure in the same area <br />The hardship is caused by special conditions and circumstances, which are peculiar to the <br />property. Due to small lot size, lake setbacks, access to the rear of the propety and the property <br />being located on a cul-de-sac the site has limited buildable area. The development in which the <br />property is located is an older established neighborhood. Since the structures were built, there <br />may have been ordinance changes, as there are other structures in the area that encroach in the <br />current front yard setback requirements. <br />3. The sbecial conditions and circumstances are not a consequence of the petitioner's own action or inaction. <br />The conditions are not a consequence of the petitioner's own action or inaction. <br />4. The literal at~i~lication o~the brovisions o~this ordinance would derive the~etitioner of rights en~oved by other <br />~ro~erties in the same district under the terms of this ordinance. <br />Without a front yard variance, the property could not construct a new functional garage or one <br />that meets the city's minimum requirement. The variance would not establish inconsistency with <br />the neighborhood character. <br />S. The variance will not be injurious to or adversely a~ect the health salty or we~are o~the residents o~the city or <br />the neighborhood where the~ro~erty is located and will be in keeling with sbirit and intent of the ordinance <br />The request will not be injurious to or adversely affect the health, safety or welfare of the <br />residents of the city or the neighborhood where the property is located. <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\Variance\V 07-04 Bicl:man\V 07-04_BA.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.