My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 01-22-2008
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2008
>
01-22-2008
>
6.1. SR 01-22-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2008 2:33:08 PM
Creation date
1/18/2008 11:04:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/22/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.^~/ <br />City of <br />Elk -`-~ <br />River <br />To Item Number <br />Ci Council 6.1. <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Community Development January 22, 2008 Rebecca Haug, Environmental <br /> Administrator <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />Request by Kevin Meland for Extension of Interim Use Permit, Jerem Barnhart, Plannin Mana er <br />Case No. CU 08-01 -Public Hearing Reviewed by <br />Action Requested <br />Staff and the Planning Commission recommend denial on the Interim Use Permit Extension for Kevin <br />Meland. <br />Summary <br />The applicant received''an interim use permit (IUP) to mine 7.25 acres on October 25, 2005. <br />Approximately 24,000 cubic yards of material was proposed to be mined within two (2) years so a rezone <br />and license were not required. Currently, only a quarter of the ponds have been excavated. <br />Planning Commission Discussion <br />The Planning Commission recommended denial of the interim use permit. The use is not consistent with <br />the City's Comprehensive Plan as it is not zoned for Mineral Excavation. The reason behind issuing an <br />interim use permit was so the applicant would not have to be licensed and obtain a conditional use <br />permit, similar to the other mineral excavation operations in the City. <br />The applicant has stated that due to the slow market, the mining operation has not progressed as rapidly <br />as originally thought. While this slowdown is out of the applicant's control, it is equally impossible to <br />determine when the market will again support the use. <br />The IUP process was intended to allow generally small users the ability to capture the mineral deposits <br />with minimal interference from the government, with the understanding that the impact to the adjacent <br />property owners would be short-lived, i.e. two years. Because the time frame is impossible to determine, <br />it is prudent to deny the extension of the IUP and require the applicant to pursue a formal rezoning and <br />hcensure process, guaranteeing adjacent property owners the opportunity for comment. <br />Public Comment <br />Staff received two phone calls from the public who were against the issuance of an IUP extension. <br />Attachments <br />• Staff Report to Planning Commission dated January 8, 2008 <br />• Memo dated November 25, 2007 from Kevin Meland <br />• Location Map <br />• a vicinity map <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\CUP\CU 08-01 Meland\REQUUST COUNCIL ACTION.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.