Laserfiche WebLink
Citt> Council \Gnutes <br />September 18, ?006 <br />Page =~ <br />PERMIT FOR THE CLOSURE OF MAIN STREET FROM OCTOBER 2 TO <br />OCTOBER 23 PER THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED iN THE CSS BUILDERS <br />AND FLANNERY CONSTRUCTION, INC. MEMO DATED SEPTEMBER 12, <br />2006 AND AS ILLUSTRATED ON THE STREET DISRUPTION MAP DATED <br />SEPTEMBER 14, 2006 WITH THE FOLLO~~ING CONDITION: <br />i. NO EXCEPTIONS TO DEADLINE DATE. <br />I~-Iotion carried 7-0 <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILItiiEMBER MOTIN TO APPROVE A STREET DISRUPTION <br />PERMIT FOR THE RECONFIGURATION OF JACKSON STREET FROM <br />OCTOBER 30 TO NOVEMBER 27, 2006 PER THE CONDITIONS OUTLINED <br />IN THE MEMO DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 2006 FROM FLANNERY <br />CONSTRUCTION TO THE CITY OF ELK RIVER, AND AS ILLUSTRATED <br />ON THE STREET DISRUPTION MAP DATED SEPTEMBER 14, 2006.1\~Iotion <br />carried ~-0. <br />MOVED BY COUNCILMEiVIBER FARBER AND SECONDED BY <br />COUNCILMEMBER GUMPHREY TO HAVE STAFF PRESENT TO THE CITY <br />COUNCIL IN 45 DAYS A REPORT ON ALTERNATIVE <br />RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EMPLOYEE PARKING ISSUES. MOaOIl Calrled J-O. <br />A MOVED BY MAYOR KLINZING AND SECONDED BY COUNCILI4IENIBER <br />GUMPHREY TO DIRECT STAFF TO DRAFT A MICRO LOAN OR GRANT <br />POLICY FOR OFFERING ASSISTANCE TO DO~Y~NTOWN BUSINESS <br />OWNERS. ~~Iotion carried 5-0. <br />MOVED BY MAYOR KLINZING AND SECONDED BY COUNCILMEMBER <br />FARBER TO DIRECT STAFF TO RESEARCH THE COST FOR DESIGNING <br />AND CONSTRUCTING A PARKING RAMP. D4otion carried 5-0. <br />Councilmember ?~Iotin expressed concern with the cit}' moi'ing fol.-ward on construction of <br />a parlung ramp because the cit}' doesn't have the power of etzunent domain over Ell: River <br />1\~teats. <br />1\Iayor lllinzing stated the cit}' is only considering its felSlblllt5' aC t111S po1nC. <br />l~tr. Maurer stated he has some parlang ramp data that was completed prior to downtown <br />construction that he will bring bacl: to Council. <br />5.=1. Presentation Regardin~193~~ ~lvenuc Corridor <br />AIr. il4aurer reviewed the following: <br />^ Project IiistoLy for the 193~~ .lvcnue corridor <br />^ T~vo possible alignment options and the pros and cons of each <br />^ Discussions he had with individual propert}' owners <br />^ Presented a ne~v option based on input From agencies and propert}' owners <br />