01-09-2007 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Minutes January 9, 2007 Page 3 aware of the desire of the community for fine dining restaurants, and that a restaurant which is also located in Arbor Lakes is waiting to see what happens with Aldi's, since restaurants need the traffic. He stated that the overall truck traffic pattern would be the same if another junior box tenant were to locate on the site. He stated that Aldi's will likely have one truck a day to the site, and only takes 20 minutes to one hour to unload and be on their way, depending on what type of delivery it is (dairy, produce, dry goods, etc.). He stated that the retail use has been approved. He noted they have added details, the trellis, and more green elements to continue the community friendly development theme. Kent Peabody, 11713 200 Avenue NW -Stated that when fences are built, the good side is given to the neighbor, but they are getting the back side of Aldi's. He felt the use would be annoying, and they would see employees smoking out the back door, and multi-colored dumpsters lined up. He stated that the taxpayers own the common areas of the city and they should be able to post the road as a 3-ton road, thereby keeping out the trucks. He felt there should be ordinances in place to prevent idling and litter and stiff fines for noncompliance. He stated that this is not a Northwoods theme, such as has been done in Cross Lake, which has an outdoor flavor. He stated that these types of developments must be planned, and not just a dream. There being no further public comment, Chair Lemke closed the public hearing. Conunissioner Offerman stated that he did not feel this project comes anywhere near close to the design standards and he could not support it. He felt that the developer could easily get another tenant if the building were to conform to the design standards. He stated he could not believe a Class I restaurant was waiting on Aldi's approval. He felt the revised plans have taken away from progress made, not added to it. He stated that he felt the exposure of the HVAC was not appropriate, and that the massing and scale of the plan was not in keeping with the design standards and he was in favor of a recommendation for denial. Commissioner Stevens stated that he was tired of the harping on Aldi's and that there were no conditions set as to who comes first, second or third to the site. He stated that Aldi's is a permitted retail use, and that he would like to have the three and a half hours of his life back spent discussing Aldi's as the tenant. Commissioner Westgaard stated that he concurred with Commissioner Offerman. He stated it was his fear that as they continue to review buildings in this development, the design standards will become more watered down. He felt the entire building needs to comply with the design standards. He did not feel the drawings and architectural renderings met the design standards and he could not support the request. Commissioner Ropp stated that he felt it was hard to take Aldi's out of the equation, since he has seen Aldi's stores, but that it was not their decision to make whether or not Aldi's was a viable business. He did not feel the design met the Northwoods theme. He did not feel the type of restaurants located in Arbor Lakes would locate here. Commissioner Ropp stated he would not support approval. Mr. Barnhart stated that he understood the comments regarding the zero lot line, lack of buffering, and extension of the wall, but that he was not sure how the design did not meet the Commissioner's expectations regarding the design standards. He asked that they clarify what is missing. He stated that a buffer was not originally required, but that it could be