Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Minutes <br />September 11, 2007 <br />5.3. <br />C. REAR: 10-FEET <br />5. BUILDING HEIGHT SHALL B LIMITED TO 60 FEET. <br />MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br />Ms. Cartney noted that staff will also requ st authorization from the City Co, <br />the accessory structure requirements in all commercial and industrial districts <br />still meet the City's expectation. <br />Ms. Cartney explained that the applicant <br />line development to construct a retail sp <br />Home Depot building. The shared wall <br />businesses. She noted that it was anticil <br />would be constructed in this location. S <br />presented. <br />Chair Stevens opened the public hearing. <br />Page 3 <br />al to review <br />confirm they <br />requesting a conditional use permit or a zero lot <br />(Dollar Tree) attached to the north end of the <br />l also be the property line that separ tes the two <br />ed in the PUD process that a struc re/business <br />E recommends approval of the requ st as <br />Pat Gordy, 19031 Zane Street -Stated tha he is a 20-year resident and owner f the existing <br />"dollar" store in Elk River. He stated he 'd not feel that the community cool support two <br />stores of this type. He provided informati n regarding the number of Dollar ree stores, <br />employee wages, source of products, etc. e noted that he pays an average of 9.75 per <br />hour to his employees, versus $7.00 per h ur by Dollar Tree. He asked that th Planning <br />Commission not allow a second store oft is type due to its impact on his busi ess. <br />Russ McGinty, representing the applicant, TM Development -stated that he ould <br />sympathize with Mr. Gordy, but that he fe t the area can support two of the sa e type <br />businesses. He cited as an example, there re two Great Clips salons in Elk Ri er. <br />There being no further public comment, (hair Stevens closed the public <br />Commissioner Westgaard stated that he fe t the zero lot line setback was cc <br />intent of the development. He stated that e could appreciate the business <br />concerns, but that the request was not to a dress the type of business to oc <br />He stated he had no issues with the reques and would support approval. <br />concurred. <br />MOTION BY COMMISSIONER AUS AD AND SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER WESTGAARD TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL O <br />REQUEST BY STM DEVELOPMEN FOR A CONDITIONAL USE <br />TO ALLOW A ZERO LOT LINE DE ELOPMENT, CASE NO. CU 0 <br />MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br />5.4. Request by AJ's Complete Auto <br />No. CU 07-24 -Public Hearin <br />Mr. Barnhart reviewed AJ's Complete Au <br />request, it is important to look at the uses <br />greatest concern being parking. He state <br />with the <br />the space. <br />Stevens <br />THE <br />-27. <br />motive's request. He stated that in r viewing the <br />the area and how they function, wi the <br />that additional auto sales do not se to be the <br />