Laserfiche WebLink
~~,~ `~1 <br />ITEM 4. <br />ity of ~~ MEMORANDUM <br />River TO: Mayor & City Council <br />lk • <br />FROM: Pat Klaers, City Admi or <br />DATE: February 20, 1995 <br />SUBJECT: UPA Request for Rebate of Sanitary <br />Sewer Bills <br />Representatives from UPA will be at this City Council meeting to discuss <br />with the City Council a possible sanitary sewer billing rebate. UPA believes <br />that it has been overcharged on its sanitary sewer bill and that they deserve <br />a rebate. <br />The recent history of the UPA bills is interesting and confusing. All sewer <br />bills are based on water consumption and things started getting complicated <br />at UPA when they began using City water for their air conditioning and <br />cooling system. This water was not discharged into the sewer system, but <br />discharged directly into the river. Accordingly, UPA believed that they <br />. should not have been charged based on water usage, but should have been <br />charged on what was discharged into the treatment plant. No meter was <br />installed by UPA to determine how much was discharged into the treatment <br />plant, but, by mutual agreement, the billed amount was based on fifty <br />percent of the water usage amount. This agreement took place in about <br />1991. <br />Another factor in the UPA bills that shorted the City was the fact that the <br />Municipal Utilities mischarged a number of large consumers around 1992-93. <br />The Council may recall discussion regarding the Utilities billing one third of <br />the rate that should have been charged out. This resulted in UPA paying <br />only one third of the total that it should have. About a year ago, this error <br />was corrected. However, from the City point of view, for about two years <br />UPA only paid 33 percent of what it should have. <br />Also about one year ago, improvements were made at UPA, and the WWTP <br />Superintendent understood that all of the facilities at UPA were then hooked <br />up to the City water system and that no private wells were being used. <br />Accordingly, WWTP Superintendent Darrell Mack sent a letter to UPA that <br />advised them that they would be billed at 100 percent of the water usage and <br />no longer at the 50 percent rate. Evidently this letter did not get to the right <br />people at UPA and the increased fees were charged and paid for about eight <br />• months before the situation was brought to the attention of the appropriate <br />13065 Orono Parkway • P.O. Box 490 • Elk River, MN 55330 • (612) 441-7420 • Fax: (612) 441-7425 <br />