Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />To Item Number <br />Ci Council 3.7. <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Consent December 17, 2007 Lori ohnson, Ci Administrator <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />Consider Services Agreement for WebQA <br /> Reviewed by <br />Action Requested <br />Consider entering into a services agreement with WebQA. <br />Background/Discussion <br />Several years ago, the City implemented an on-line tool called RequestPartners far citizens and others to <br />report complaints and request services through the City's website. The program was also intended to <br />allow staff to track complaints and requests, and to ensure responses were made in a timely manner. <br />However, despite efforts to make the public aware of this service, use by the public has been very limited. <br />Because the ability for residents to contact the City at their convenience is very important to us and <br />because our current system is not being utilized as we had expected, a committee was formed to research <br />how to better provide this service to the public. The goal of the committee was to determine if we <br />needed to market RequestPartners more in an effort to increase use or see if a better, easier to use, and <br />more comprehensive program was available to meet our needs. The committee members were Jeff <br />Beahen, Sheila Cartney, Jennifer Johnson, Tonya Love, Terry Maurer, Tristan Nicka, and Bruce West. <br />After much surveying and research, the committee recommended purchasing a program called WebQA. <br />Several other staff members and I also viewed WebQA and agree with the committee. <br />WebQA is an on-line program that is much more user-friendly, comprehensive, and adaptable than our <br />current program. It provides several additional tools that aren't available with RequestPartners such as <br />the ability to survey residents through on-line surveys; the ability for the public to receive immediate <br />responses to certain questions because it contains an option to allow staff to have set responses to those <br />questions; it allows for a frequently asked question section for citizens who have questions on routine <br />issues such as tall grass, requesting park shelters, etc.; and it will integrate on-line payments. These <br />features will help us to provide more information to the public more quickly than we currently can. <br />Finally, not only do we feel this product will serve the City and its residents much better, it is also less <br />expensive. Depending on the optional modules that the City chooses, the cost will still be about $600 <br />less than the $6,000 per year the City pays for RequestPartners. WebQA, if approved, would be <br />implemented along with the City's website update that is expected to be complete in the next few <br />months. <br />S:\Council\Lori\2007\WebQA 12 17 07.doc <br />