My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.1. SR 12-10-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
12-10-2007
>
5.1. SR 12-10-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2007 9:06:30 AM
Creation date
12/7/2007 9:06:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item # 5.1. <br />cty <br />E <br />fiver <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: City Council <br />FROM: Jeremy Barnhart, Planning Manager <br />DATE: December 10, 2007 <br />SUBJECT: Propose Policy Extending Approved But Not Acted Upon <br />Preliminary Plats and Conditional Use Permits <br />This information is presented to open discussion. <br />Periodically over the last several months, the City has received a number of requests to <br />extend the approval of a conditional use permit, prelirrunary, or final plat. This is expected <br />to continue and with the downturn of the housing market, may increase in the coming <br />months, most notable for preliminary plats. Per City Ordinance, expiration dates of the <br />various applications: <br />^ CUP -expires if not acted upon in 2 years, with PC recommendation (30-656) <br />^ Variance - 2 years unless substantial action has been taken (30-635) <br />^ Prelim Plat - 1 year to submit a final plat*, three year maximum for phased plats <br />(30-374) <br />^ *Final Plat - no limit. <br />Typically, there is little cause for concern for extensions if good faith progress is being made <br />on an approved project. There is concern, though, when no action is being taken, often <br />because the applicant is "waiting out the market" ar is having trouble getting financing, etc. <br />Additionally, the longer the time between Council action and developer improvement, the <br />greater potential that an application may no longer meet the goals of the City, or that <br />ordinances or policies could change and these changes may not be implement-able to the <br />unbuilt applications, specifically preliminary plats. <br />A published policy guiding the Council in determining appropriate extensions would be <br />beneficial to both the Council and the applicants, making clear the Council desire for action <br />on these applications while at the same time preventing perceptions of unfair treatment <br />(approving one extension but not another). To safeguard against these concerns, the Council <br />could, by policy, respond to extension requests as follows. <br />S:~PLANNING~POLICY- Approval extension memo.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.