My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
INFORMATION #4 12-03-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
12/03/2007
>
INFORMATION #4 12-03-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2008 2:59:27 PM
Creation date
11/30/2007 9:37:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/3/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FCC order applies 5 percent cap on franchise fees to incumbent cable companies Page 1 of 2 <br />~- <br />~1,~~ <br />~ ~". <br />~.CiU J c~~ i <br />11~tC~~~C~TA <br />~1"r1~5 c~~f~~ ~~aza <br />FCC order applies 5 percent cap. on franchise fees to incumbent <br />cable companies <br />Issue 32 Published: November 15, <br />Ann Higgins <br />On Nov. 6, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released its Second Report and Order on <br />implementation of federal cable laws for competitive franchising. The cap on franchise fees that the FCC <br />previously only applied to competitive franchisees was extended. to incumbent cable systems operating i~ <br />compliance with existing local franchises. <br />Though the new FCC order is not yet in effect, some cable attorneys have raised concerns that the effecti <br />date for provisions related to payment of PEG fees and costs for installation and operation of institutiona <br />networks (I Nets) is ambiguous and may be subject to claims that such restrictions would become effecti <br />immediately. In general, however, FCC orders are not effective unti130 days after they are published in ~ <br />Federal Register, which would likely mean that the effective'date would occur at the close of 2007. <br />The order leaves cities and local franchising authorities with many unanswered questions about the <br />implications of the new ruling. In circumstances where local franchise agreements contain provisions foi <br />incumbent to pay additional fees or make in-kind contributions to support local programming for public, <br />educational, and government (PEG) channels and/or maintain I Nets, local officials are uncertain what tr <br />order may mean for future payments or other contributions for support of PEG services. <br />The order does not set aside existing franchises, but raises question about whether cities may anticipate <br />requests by current cable system operators to modify current franchise agreements or to offset such PEG <br />support from the total of the current amount of franchise fee revenues paid to cities. <br />At the national level, the National League of Cities as well as-other groups representing the interests of 1~ <br />franchising authorities, counties, PEG programmers and facilities, and the U.S. Conference of Mayors h~ <br />joined in challenging the latest FCC order. <br />The League will be monitoring the situation and conferring with attorneys who practice cable law in <br />Minnesota as well as with the National League of Cities. We will make cities aware of developments <br />regarding this issue as well as when the FCC findings regarding offsets from franchise fee payments for <br />fee and I-Net obligations may, in some circumstances, be effective sooner. <br />LMC Board Editor: Designer: Executive Director: <br />of Directors Eri..ca.Norris._Perlman. Jason Little Jim_Miller <br />Copyright ©2007 League of~Minnesota Cities <br />145 University Ave. West, St. Paul, MN 55103 <br />Phone: 651-281-1200 ~ Toll Free: 1-800-925-1122 <br />http://www.lmnc.org/bulletin/story.cfm?id=1637&title_id=1 11/16/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.