My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.6. SR 11-19-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
11/19/2007
>
3.6. SR 11-19-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:10 AM
Creation date
11/16/2007 10:48:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/19/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~i REQUEST FOR ACTION <br />River <br />To Item Number <br />Ci Council 3.6. <br />Agenda Section Meeting Date Prepared by <br />Consent November 19, 2007 Tina Allard, Ci Clerk <br />Item Description Reviewed by <br />Consider Restated Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Lori ohnson, Ci Administrator <br />Administration of Cable Communications Systems Reviewed by <br />Action Requested <br />Approve Restated Joint and Cooperative Agreement for the Administration of Cable Communications <br />Systems (Agreement). <br />Background/Discussion <br />Elk River belongs to the Sherburne/Wright County Cable Communications Commission (Commission). <br />There aze 1D member cities that aze part of the Commission who entered into a Joint and Cooperative <br />Agreement for administering a cable communications system. The Commission felt the Agreement <br />needed to be updated fox the following reasons: <br />^ The original Agreement only addressed the administration of member city franchises by one cable <br />operator. Lately there have been some communities in Minnesota receiving requests fox <br />competitive cable franchises. The Commission wanted to clarify that any possible future <br />franchises by a member city would be required to fall under the umbrella of the Commission. <br />^ The original Agreement only addressed franchise fees. The cities now receive PEG fees. (A cable <br />operator must provide PEG access facilities, which aze public, educational, and governmental <br />programming channels). The Restated Agreement clarifies that these PEG fees and any additional <br />payments paid by a cable operator must go to the Cable Commission. <br />^ Minor language cleanup. <br />The Agreement does not requite the city to use the Commission to negotiate any future franchises; it <br />would be at the option of the city. All fees would be required to gn to the Commission and all franchise <br />agreements should be the same. <br />Attachments <br />^ Letter from Cable Commissioner Chair Phil Kern <br />^ Redline copy of restated agreement <br />Action Motion by _ Second by _ Vote <br />Follow Up <br />S:\Cound\Cleck\Cable Commission\Restated Memo to CC.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.