My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.3. SR 11-19-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
11/19/2007
>
3.3. SR 11-19-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:10 AM
Creation date
11/16/2007 10:46:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/19/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case Pile: 0.9 07-t2 <br />Page 2 <br />General Information <br />Ordinance Amendment <br />Phil Collins <br />Applicant Phil Collins -Collins Brothers Towing <br />60 Day Rule The application has been deemed complete as of August 10, <br />2002 The City must take action by October 5, 2007 <br />Requested Action Ordinance Amendment <br />Location and Size All I-2 zoning districts <br />Overview <br />Cuxxendy there is conflicting information regarding accessory structures. Pex Section 30-1292 & 30- <br />12)3, accessory structures are not allowed in either I-1 ox I-2 industrial zoning districts. Yet, section <br />30-1312 (Accessory Structure Setbacks) of the city code does provide setback requirements fox the <br />industrial zoned districts, but again both zoning districts do not list "accessory structures" as <br />allowed. <br />The applicant is asking fox an Ordinance Amendment to allow accessory structures specifically in <br />the I-2 Medium Industrial zoning districts. The applicant would like to construct an accessory <br />structure fox storage of company vehicles. They operate a towing business. <br />The Planning Commission and City Council, as you may recall, reviewed a sitnilax request fox the <br />Business Paxk zoning districts and found that accessory structures were appropriate in the business <br />parks. Staff believes this request is the same in spirit and intent that the Business Paxk ordinance <br />amendment was. Both the Planning Commission and the City Council agreed that accessory <br />structures axe appropriate in the Business Park zoning districts and the City Council did approve <br />that ordinance amendment. <br />This ordinance amendment request would affect all properties in the I-2 zoning districts. <br />This a summary of what is being xecottunend: <br />1. Accessory Structures will be administratively pernritted under accessory uses. <br />2. Accessory Structures would need to meet the design guidelines for the Medium Industrial zoning <br />district. <br />3. The maximum size allowed for an accessory structure shall be limited to 20% of the maximum lot <br />coverage. <br />4. Setbacks: <br />a. Front: 30-Feet <br />b. Side: 10-Feet <br />c Rear: 10-Feet <br />5. Building height shall be limited to 60-feet <br />Additionally, staff would request authorization to review the accessory structure requirements in all <br />commercial and industrial districts to confirm they still meet the City's expectation. <br />S:\PLANNING\Case Files\OA\O,A 07-12 Collins Bxos Touring\OA 07-12_PC.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.