My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.12. SR 01-23-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
01-23-1995
>
5.12. SR 01-23-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:09 AM
Creation date
10/22/2007 1:02:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
1/23/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />an area from having to connect by not assessing the area <br />for water. For instance, homes built in Sandpiper <br />before water is available would not be required to <br />connect when water does become available unless the City <br />Council assessed for water. <br /> <br />(4 ) <br /> <br />This section applies to buildings existing on the date <br />of adoption of the ordinance, when water becomes <br />available in the future. Same rules as in paragraph (3) <br />above apply. <br /> <br />(5 ) <br /> <br />This section applies to buildings existing on the date <br />of adoption of the ordinance to which water is currently <br />available but which have not been assessed for water. <br />This section provides that connection is not required <br />until two years after the property is assessed. This <br />situation applies to many of the homes in the Fresno <br />area and along Orono Road. <br /> <br />(6 ) <br /> <br />This paragraph applies to existing buildings where water <br />is available and assessments have been made, but which <br />are not connected at the time of adoption of the <br />ordinance. For instance, the Westwood area. This <br />section provides that residential buildings with one or <br />two units which fit into this category will not be <br />required to connect unless the Council determines that <br />it is necessary for them to connect for public health <br />reasons. <br /> <br />I realize this alternative ordinance is somewhat complicated. <br />However, the intent is to write into the ordinance the policies <br />which the Council has adopted over the years while also treating <br />all similarly situated properties the same. I think it does <br />achieve this goal, even though it is somewhat complicated. The <br />proposed ordinance also treats single family homes and duplexes <br />differently from multiple family and commercial buildings. This <br />should be brought to the attention of the Council for their <br />decision as to whether these different types of property should <br />be treated differently. <br /> <br />Please review both options and give me a call with your thoughts. <br /> <br />Enclosure <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />PKB:JOOs <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.