Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The limits of coverage and options have been discussed in workshop about <br />two years ago. Should the Council wish to revisit these matters, I would be <br />happy to present the details in a workshop setting again. And should the <br />Council decide to purchase the additional limits this year; we will include the <br />cost in the final proposal and motion. <br /> <br />7) The Vehicle schedule for this year includes 165 units. The average cost per <br />unit has dropped this year, as both liability and physical damage rates have <br />decreased by 3% for 2007. <br /> <br />8) The City changed to a $2,500 deductible in 2004. Last year, we recommended <br />a change to $5,000. or higher, however, the Council decided to stay another <br />year with the $2,500 deductible level. For the 2007-2008 coverage period, <br />we are again recommending that the Council vote to accept a $5,000 <br />Deductible. We have prepared a brief analysis of premium savings and <br />deductible costs over the past 4 years. to help demonstrate why we feel this <br />change would be a reasonable decision. <br /> <br />Although a four-year analysis may be a somewhat short time frame to <br />consider, there are other factors to consider. The frequency of claims appears <br />to have declined considerably over the past 4-5 years. This is a good indicator <br />that loss control programs and safety training are making a difference. For <br />example, the number of "occurrences" resulting in payment over the past 4 <br />years is about one-half the numbers just 5 and 6 years ago. <br /> <br />The City has elected a $10,000 deductible for Workers Compensation <br />coverage for a number of years now, and has done well with this decision. <br />Frequency of injuries has dropped and the experience modifier is excellent. <br />The City has also put new safety programs and additional training in place to <br />help prevent losses. The City has set aside LMCIT dividends to help fund <br />deductible expenses and loss control programs. so would have a "safety net" <br />in place to fund future additional deductible expenses. <br /> <br />One of the concerns the Council had last year was that a change to a larger <br />deductible would also impact ERMU. We have discussed the possibility of a <br />$5,000 Deductible with Bryan Adams. and he indicated he would be <br />comfortable with the $5,000 figure. <br /> <br />And last, is the potential premium savings - changing to a S5,000 Deductible <br />for the 2007-2008 term would result in a reduction in the immediate premium <br />costs of approximately $21,000, and if we use an average of the past 4 years <br />history to calculate additional deductible expenses, the "net" savings would <br />still be about $14.800. If the City selects the S5,000 deductible this year and <br />finds it was not a good choice, the City can return to its previous deductible <br />at the next renewal. <br /> <br />It is also important to keep in mind that the LMCIT package deductible <br />applies on an "occurrence" basis, rather than "per claim". This means that in <br />