My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
08/20/2007
>
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:05 AM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:09:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Redevelopment Framework Task Force Minutes <br />August 13, 2007 <br />Page 2 <br />proposed river trail also be added to tonig~it's agenda. She said that it is not typical in a <br />normal redevelopment planning process tIl© react to the public comments at this point <br />because it is important to let the redevelopment planning process "play itself out". She <br />specifically mentioned the importance of athering all of the public input from City Boards <br />and Commissions and the general public ~rior to making refinements to the Draft Plan. In <br />addition, she said that it is important to b~ consistent by showing the same Draft Plan to the <br />public. <br />4. Summary Report of Stakeholder Meetingsi <br />Assistant Director of Economic Developrl~ent Heidi Steinmetz summarized her staff report <br />regarding the July 24 stakeholders meetin stn addition to written public comments received <br />as of August 7. She stated that the top tw~ issues of concern submitted via written <br />comments were the river trail and high density housing. She added that staff is not asking <br />for the Task Force to take action regarding her report since staff will be gathering and <br />providing additional public comments to the Task Force in October for review and <br />consideration in refining the plan. <br />5. Discuss River Trail Concept <br />Director of Economic Development Catherine Iv~Iehehch summarized her staff report <br />regarding a request made by a several residents of the 1\lorton/Norfolk neighborhood, to <br />consider removing the river trail that is currently depicted in the Draft Redevelopment <br />Framework Plan and Draft Illustrati~-e Land Use Plan. <br />She invited John Babcock, spokesperson for the neighborhood, to add any comments <br />regarding the neighborhood's request. I~lr. Babcock distributed a summary of written <br />comments from the neighborhood to the "Task Force and provided additional verbal <br />comments he had received from neighbors regarding the issue. <br />Ms. Mehelich introduced Bill Maertz, Parrs cYc Recreation Director, who was in attendance <br />to answer any questions from the Task Force. She asked the Task Force if they wished to <br />make revisions to its Draft Plan now, or 111ow the process to proceed in order to allow the <br />rest of the. conununit_<r anopportunit~- to ~arovide comments prior to modifying the Draft <br />Plan. <br />Discussion ensued regarding a variety of options for how to refine the Draft Plan in reaction <br />to the. neighborhood's request, including the option of a river trail beginning at the dam and <br />ending at Babcock Park. <br />Task Force member Molly Nadeau asked'~bout a parks and trails map that she heard was <br />circulating around the City. Mr. Maertz responded that the map is two years old and that it <br />reflects the Cin-'s Comprehensive Parks & Trails Plan approved in 1989. He has received <br />comments from property owners recently about proposed trails being included on the map <br />and will replace the map to indicate only existing trails. <br />Member Dana Anderson stated that the Ibraft Plan is not "reinventing the wheel" by <br />including a proposed trail along the Mississippi and Elk Rivers because this trail has been <br />included in the Master Park Plan for years. He asked the Task Force why they were <br />discussing options for refining the Draft lan regarding the trail before answering the <br />question "Do we want the process to pro eed in order to allow the rest of the community an <br />opportunity to provide comments prior t modifying the Draft Plan?" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.