My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
08/20/2007
>
6.2. SR 08-20-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:05 AM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:09:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Downtown Redevelopment Plan Task Force <br />March 5, 2007 meeting <br />Small Group Question #1 <br />Is it important that downtown be "seen" and/pr accessed from Hwy 10? <br />• Which option for Hwy 10 is least detrimental to downtown? <br />o Elevated <br />o Lowered <br />o At grade '~ <br />Grou 1 <br />• A visual is needed so that Hwy 10 travelers know they are entering downtown Elk <br />River. <br />• Access from Hwy 10 into downtown is important for local traffic but for Hwy 10 <br />commuters. <br />• Keep Hwy 10 at grade and study other options. <br />• Local residents' access in and out of d~wntown from Hwy 10 takes precedence over <br />commuters' access. '~ <br />i <br />• The "as is" option is preferred but the$e is a need for safe pedestrian access between <br />the north and south sides of the highway. <br />Grou 2 ', <br />• It is important that downtown Elk River is seen and accessed from Hwy 10. <br />• The "at grade" version of Hwy 10 is preferred. <br />• The removal of a Main Street access into downtown from Hwy 10 better allows <br />redevelopment opportunities north of'Hwy 10. <br />Grou 3 <br />• The "at grade" or "do nothing" appro~ch continues to serve the area the best <br />because of the disruption Hwy 10 rec nstruction would cause, etc. <br />• The elevated option has poor aesthetic appeal. <br />Small Group Questions #2 ', <br />Is the land area north of Hwy 10 an extension', of the core downtown and should the Plan <br />recognize this? <br />Group 1 (same responses as Group 21 <br />Grou 2 <br />• The north side of Hwy 10 should compliment the south side in relation to land use <br />and architecture. <br />• The north side of the highway is not an extension of the core downtown. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.