My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6. SR 08-13-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Redevelopment Framework Taskforce
>
2007
>
6. SR 08-13-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:05 AM
Creation date
8/10/2007 12:26:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Downtown Redevelopment Plan Task Force <br />March 5, 2007 meeting <br /> <br />Small Group Question #1 <br />Is it important that downtown be "seen" and/or accessed from Hwy 10? <br />. Which option for Hwy 10 is least detrimental to downtown? <br />o Elevated <br />o Lowered <br />o At grade <br /> <br />Group 1 <br />. A visual is needed so that Hwy 10 travelers know they are entering downtown Elk <br />River. <br />. Access from Hwy 10 into downtown is important for local traffic but for Hwy 10 <br />commuters. <br />. Keep Hwy 10 at grade and study other options. <br />. Local residents' access in and out of downtown from Hwy 10 takes precedence over <br />commuters' access. <br />. The "as is" option is preferred but there is a need for safe pedestrian access between <br />the north and south sides of the highway. <br /> <br />Group 2 <br />. It is important that downtown Elk River is seen and accessed from Hwy 10. <br />. The "at grade" version of Hwy 10 is preferred. <br />. The removal of a Main Street access into downtown from Hwy 10 better allows <br />redevelopment opportunities north of Hwy 10. <br /> <br />Group 3 <br />. The "at grade" or "do nothing" approach continues to serve the area the best <br />because of the disruption Hwy 10 reconstruction would cause, etc. <br />. The elevated option has poor aesthetic appeal. <br /> <br />Small Group Questions #2 <br />Is the land area north of Hwy lOan extension of the core downtown and should the Plan <br />recognize this? <br /> <br />Group 1 (same responses as Group 2) <br /> <br />Group 2 <br /> <br />. The north side of Hwy 10 should compliment the south side in relation to land use <br />and architecture. <br /> <br />. The north side of the highway is not an extension of the core downtown. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.