My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4. SR 08-13-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Redevelopment Framework Taskforce
>
2007
>
4. SR 08-13-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:05 AM
Creation date
8/10/2007 12:24:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/13/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page 2 of3 <br /> <br />our bikes in our vehicle and drive in order to arrive safely and use the existing trail system. <br />How about connecting some ofthe existing neighborhoods to existing trails and make the most <br />of what exists? <br /> <br />And on the note of making the most of what we have, why isn't the waterfront area between <br />Parrish and Babcock Park being developed for the public? Doesn't the city already own it? It <br />would connect the public to the river without taking property from private citizens. <br /> <br />Also, wasn't there a proposed walkway behind the Bluffs building for access to the river by the <br />public? Why is it now routed to the front ofthe building? <br /> <br />3) HIGH DENSITY HOUSING: With regard to more high density housing around Lion's Park. <br />Isn't that already a nightmare for the police department? Wouldn't adding more make it worse? <br /> <br />JACKSON: While I like the idea of trees on the boulevard along Jackson I question what kind <br />of care and maintenance will be provided? Is there a maintenance budget? I was embarrassed <br />by the tall weeds growing up in the sidewalk cracks last summer and the summer before. I <br />imagined people passing through town on highway 10 thinking. .. "the city has money for <br />fancy new buildings, but they can't afford to hire someone to pull the weeds!" This year the <br />weeding seems to be under control. Like wise, the planters that can be found on the sidewalks <br />downtown don't get planted with flowers until mid summer. I am not sure who does this work <br />for the city, but I am a gardener and want things cared for if they are going to be added. <br /> <br />FINAL NOTE, BUT MOST IMPORTANT! I talked to some of the small business owners along <br />Main Street. A lot of them feel defeated and that it's only a matter oftime until their buildings are <br />demolished for more new downtown. HOW SAD is that! Many private business owners feel so <br />unsupported even undermined by the city. What kind of town creates such apathy? I was <br />told "GOOD LUCK the city will do what it wants". We do know that the rents/leases in those new <br />buildings are beyond the means of many small business. This means we are inviting the chains and <br />franchises in to take over. Simple as that. Why doesn't the city offer some type of financial <br />incentive for the existing building owners to update the facades of the existing buildings? Why <br />don't we wait and see how the existing new development turns out before we jump into more huge <br />undertakings? Mean while there's plenty of smaller steps that can be taken, to improve our town. <br /> <br />Ifwe wanted to live in FAKE TOWN instead of a real town we would have moved to Maple Grove. <br /> <br />7/24/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.