4. SR 08-13-2007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Summary Report of Stakeholders Meetings Page 2 of 3 Summary Report Methodology This summary report is based on the 45 "parties" who provided written comments. "Parties" is defined by the following: . A married couple who submitted comments together . An organization who submitted joint comments, i.e. churches, associations, banks, etc. . A person or married couple who submitted a set of comments, i.e. sent both an e-mail and a comment form In other words, this summary is not based on the amount of submittals; it is based on the amount of "parties" who submitted written comments. Not included in this summary is the following: . Verbal comments . Inconclusive questions . Seven anonymous written comments and/or questions submitted at the property owner meetings Written comments were received by staff via the following means: . E-mails sent direcdy to staff . E-mails forwarded to staff by Councilmembers . Comment forms submitted at or after the property owner meetings . Written comments and/or questions submitted at property owner meetings . 1 fax The comments received were not easily quantified; rather the comments are more qualitative in nature, so it is important that the Task Force read the comments. For instance, the two main issues of concern (the proposal trail and the addition of high density housing) do not represent the majority of those parties who submitted written comments. Those opposed to the trail represent 1/3 of the comments received and those opposed to high density housing represent just over % of the comments received. Summary Report Main Issues of Concern . 15 parties are concerned about the safety/privacy of the proposed trail. . 11 parties are concerned about the addition of high density housing (7 of which specified the area adjacent to Lions Park and 4 parties are concerned with adding high density housing in general). . 6 parties are concerned about utilizing Jackson Ave. as the main access into downtown. . 6 parties expressed general parking concerns. . 6 parties are disappointed with the public input process thus far. . 5 parties are concerned about general traffic issues. . 4 parties suggested that a Highway 10 study be completed prior to fInalizing the plan.