My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.5. SR 08-06-2007
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2007
>
08/06/2007
>
5.5. SR 08-06-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:04 AM
Creation date
8/3/2007 11:16:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
8/6/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />THE GIS LAYERS AND ACCOMPANYING <br />DATABASE W1U BE GIVEN TO THE CITY <br />IN THE CITY's DESIRED FORMAT FOR <br />INTEGRAnON INTO ITS GIS SYSTEM. <br /> <br />Each sub-watershed, basin, and evaluation point will have a unique and <br />logical identifier. Assessment results for phosphorus, TSS and water <br />volume-for each of the three timeframes-will be linked to the basin <br />identifiers so easy reference to these specific loading assessment values <br />can be made. The GIS layers and accompanying database will be given to <br />the City in the City's desired format for integration into its GIS system. <br /> <br />With Elk River's Loading Assessment, City staff and Bonestroo will have <br />accomplished the following: <br /> <br />· Drainage areas for all evaluation points for both the 1988, 2004, and <br />2020 conditions <br /> <br />· Appropriate, credible, and defensible calculations and justification for <br />inputs such as runoff coefficients, runoff pollutant concentrations, and <br />infiltration assumptions <br /> <br />· Loading to evaluation points and from Elk River into other jurisdictions for <br />TSS, phosphorus, and water volume <br /> <br />· Documentation including maps and detailed tables (compiled into a single <br />document) that comprehensively summarize methodology and results <br /> <br />Task J De/iverab/es: <br /> <br />. A map defining evaluation points, drainage areas, sub-watersheds, and <br />watersheds for all areas included in the analysis. The map will clearly <br />indicate what areas are not included in the analysis due to not having <br />changed over the analysis timeframe. <br /> <br />. A table outlining land use in modeled areas for three conditions: 1988, <br />2004, and 2020. <br /> <br />. A table comparing TSS and phosphorus loadings and water volume at all <br />evaluation points across the three time frames. <br /> <br />. A table outlining assumptions on the treatment capacity of ponds, <br />wetlands and other BMPs. <br /> <br />. GIS shapefiles for sub-watershed boundaries and evaluation points. 'i <br /> <br />Items we assume are performed by City or County staff in Task J: <br /> <br />· Collect electronic GIS tiles as identified in task 1. <br /> <br />. Identify constructed pond locations. <br /> <br />· Identify drainage patterns and routing in cases where the City's storm <br />sewer base mapping is not clear in this regard. <br /> <br />. Identify areas that have developed since 1988 and what stormwater <br />design standards were applied to these areas when they developed. <br /> <br />. Identify gravel mining areas currently in operation within the City limits. <br /> <br />. Assist in correlating among 2020 guided land use categories, existing land <br />use or zoning, and 1988 land use. <br /> <br />.tt Bonestroo <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.