6.2. SR 11-21-1994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Elk River City Councill\1inutes June 20, 1994 Page 10 --------------------- COUNCILMEMBER DIETZ AMENDED THE MOTION TO DELETE ITEM #3 REGARDING THE PARK DEDICATION FEES BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS PROPOSED ON THE NEWLY CREATED PARCELS. COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SECONDED THE AMENDMENT. THE AMENDMENT PASSED 4-0. THE MOTION AS AMENDED PASSED 4-0. 9.6. Consider an Administrative Subdivision reauest bv Gerold Sneft/P.H./Case No. AS 94-10 ;' PI ning AssIstant Gory Schmitz Indicated that Gerald Sneft i0equesting an ad . istrative subdivision to divide 0 39 acre parcel into 0 10.4 o/re parcel and 0 28.67 re porcellocated at the intersection of County Rood 2)f and Jarvis Street. Mayor Duit on opened the public hearing. There bein~ one for or against the matter, M or Duitsman closed the public hearing. 9.7. COUNCILMEMBER RBER MOVED TO APPROVE THE A, INISTRATIVE SUBDIVISION REQUESTED BY GERAL SNEFT TO DIVIDE 39 ACRES INT' A 10.4 ACRE PARCEL AND A 28.67 ACRE PARCEL WIT THE FOLLOWING CONDlTIr: THAT PAYMENT OF P . K DEDICATION FEEStN THE AMCUNT OF $450 BE PAID TO THE CITY PRIOR TO CORDING. / COUNCILMEMBER HOLMGREN SEC DEDi MOTION. 1'HE MOTION CARRIED 5-0. Consider a Conditional Use Permit Re ~st and an associated Variance Reauest by Richard Lundbero/P.H./Case No. C~-14 and V 94-05 Planning Assistant Gory Schmitz in~di "ed ~. t Mr. Richard Lundberg is requesting o variance to exceed the me 'mum S;;~f an accessory building and 0 conditional use permit to enc~ ch on the 3 foot setback for on accessory building containing livestock.. Gory Schmitz 'ndicated that the Planning Commission concurred with s' ff'S findings on the ariance that hardship could not be shown and, thereforl recommended denia He further indicated that the Planning Commission reo ommended approval of t conditional use permit. Mayor Duitsman opened he public hearing. There be in the motter, Mayor Duits an closed the public hearing. COUNCILMEMBER SCH EL MOVED TO APPROVE A CONDITIO RICHARD LUNDBERG 0 ENCROACH ON THE 300 FOOT S BACK FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ACCEf SORY BUILDING. COUNCILMEMBER FARBE SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTIO}J CARRIED 5-0. COUNCILMEMBER FARBER MOVED TO DENY THE VARIANCE REQUEST TO\EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SIZE OF AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE IN THE R-l A ZONING DftsTRfCT DUE TO THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS: \ '\ 1. THIS WOULD NOT CAUSE UNDUE HARDSHIP IN THAT THE APPLlCANT~WOULD ~. STILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO CONSTRUCT A 1,424 SQUARE FOOT DET"ACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING FOR HIS HORSES.