My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5.12. SR 12-19-1994
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1994
>
12/19/1994
>
5.12. SR 12-19-1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:37:01 AM
Creation date
6/27/2007 1:00:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
12/19/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />LARKIN, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. <br /> <br />Attorneys at Law <br />1500 Norwest Financial Center <br />7900 Xerxes Avenue South <br />Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 <br />Telephone: (612) 835-3800 <br />FAX: (612) 896-3333 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor Henry A. Duitsman and <br />Members of the City Council <br /> <br />Peter Beck, City Attorney <br /> <br />September 12, 1994 <br /> <br />Conflict of Interest Ordinance <br /> <br />FROM: <br />DATE: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Earlier this year the City Council directed me to amend the <br />City's Conflict of Interest Ordinance to eliminate certain <br />sections which were too broad and to generally bring the <br />ordinance into closer conformance with the state conflict of <br />interest laws applicable to municipalities. In response to this <br />direction I have prepared, and attach for Council review and <br />consideration, two possible revisions of the Conflict of Interest <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />In Option 1 (attached Exhibit A) I have tried to address the City <br />Council's concerns with the existing ordinance, while still <br />maintaining a conflict of interest policy that applies to all <br />City officials and employees. Option 2 (attached Exhibit C) <br />simply incorporates the applicable state laws, which apply only <br />to "public officials" and "local officials" as those terms are <br />defined in state statutes. Option 2 would not apply to all <br />employees. <br /> <br />I am recommending the Council adopt Option 1, with further <br />revisions if deemed necessary after Council review and <br />discussion. I believe that this option addresses the concerns <br />which the City Council had earlier this year, while still <br />maintaining a comprehensive conflict of interest policy <br />applicable to all City employees, consistent with the Council's <br />action in early 1993 when the existing ordinance was adopted. <br /> <br />Attached to this memo please find the following exhibits: <br /> <br />Exhibit ;I B <br />Exhibit t A <br /> <br />Option 1 <br /> <br />Option 1 in "redlined" format, showing changes <br />from the existing ordinance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.