Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Special report: 1994 property tax data <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />GARY CARLSON <br /> <br />he payable 1994 property tax <br />data for all cities has been <br />expanded to provide additional <br />information related to the <br />property tax system and local tax <br />base. The data for all cities is again <br />provided in a single, expanded table and <br />the information has been standardized for <br />all cities. The League of Minnesota Cities <br />would like to thank the Property Tax <br />Division of the Minnesota Department of <br />Revenue for their assistance in collecting <br />this information and preparing this report. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Format <br /> <br />The property tax data is divided into <br />five broad categories of information-tax <br />base data, average tax capacity tax rate <br />data, average market value tax rate data, <br />city aid and levy data and tax base composi- <br />tion data. This information has been <br />collected from various sources but is <br />largely based on data collected and <br />compiled by the Department of Revenue <br />in the Abstract of Assessment of Real and <br />Personal Property and the Abstract of Tax <br />Usts. The information provided in the <br />table is described in the column descrip- <br />tion that follows. <br /> <br />Statewide overview of <br />1994 property tax data <br /> <br />Sluggish growth in real estate market <br />values was one of the most significant <br />highlights for property taxes in 1994. <br />Much of this problem can be attributed to <br />actual declines in the market values for <br />apartments and commercial and industrial <br />properties (see bar chart). These declines <br />were coupled with growing residential <br />homestead values, and as a result, many <br />communities experienced significant <br />shifting of the property tax burdens to <br />their homeowners. <br />For example, in St. Paul, residential <br />homesteads increased from 59.1 percent to <br />61.3 percent of the total market value. In <br />contrast, apartments decreased from 15.1 <br />percent to 14.4 percent and commercial/ <br />industrial property decreased from 20.0 <br />percent to 18.9 percent of the total market <br />value. <br />City property taxes, including fiscal <br />disparities distribution levies, increased by <br />a modest 3.7 percent over the 1993 levels. <br />Two other major city revenue sources, local <br />govemment aid (LGA) and homestead <br />and agricultural credit aid (HACA), <br />increased by 2.5 percent and 3.4 percent <br />respectively. Overall, city revenues from <br />these three primary sources increased by <br />only 3.3 percent froml993 to 1994. <br /> <br />Change in Total City Market Values <br />Taxes Payable 1993 to 1994 <br /> <br /> <br />10.0% <br /> <br />8.0% <br /> <br />6.0% <br /> <br />4.0% <br /> <br />2.0% <br /> <br />0.0% <br /> <br />-2.0% <br /> <br />-4.0% <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~.O% <br /> <br />Res Homestead <br /> <br />Farm <br /> <br />Other <br /> <br />Comm/lnd <br /> <br />Apartments <br /> <br />Cities continue to comprise only <br />approximately 20 percent of the average <br />local property tax bill. For a $72,000 <br />home, this translates to an average annual <br />city tax bill of $190, up from $184 in 1993. <br />For this amount, the homeowner receives <br />services ranging from police and fire <br />protection to snow plowing and commu- <br />nity parks. On average, the property tax <br />bill for other local units of govemment are <br />paid to the county (29 percent of the total <br />bill), school district (48 percent of the total <br />bill) and other local taxing authorities <br />(three percent of the total). The total tax <br />bill for this $72,000 home was $941 in <br />1994, up from $915 in 1993. <br /> <br />Statewide highlights <br /> <br />The 1993 city population estimates <br />reflect a 1.3 percent increase over the <br />1992 estimates. <br /> <br />Tax base highlights <br /> <br />Total tax capacity was down by ,8 <br />percent from the 1993 level. <br />Tax increment financing(TIF) <br />captured tax capacity was down by 6.5 <br />percent from the 1993 level, reflecting <br />state imposed property class rate <br />reductions, the decline in commercial <br />and industrial property market values, <br />and the decertification ofTIF districts. <br />Fiscal disparities contribution tax <br />capacity for cities in the seven-county <br />metro area declined by 4.2 percent <br />from 1993, also reflecting state <br />imposed property class rate reductions <br />and the decline in commercial and <br />industrial property values. <br />Taxable tax capacity grew by .3 percent, <br />which partially reflects increases in <br />residential homestead property values. <br /> <br />Tax rate highlights <br /> <br />The average tax burden imposed by <br />Minnesota cities remained stable at <br />approximately 20 percent of the <br />average total property tax bill (see pie <br />chart), <br />Although the 1994 school district share <br />of the average tax bill declined to 47.9 <br />percent from 48.3 percent in 1993, <br />school district market value referen- <br />dum levies increased by 124 percent to <br />more than $17.6 million for taxes <br />payable in 1994. <br />The average tax burden imposed by <br />counties and special taxing authorities <br />increased slightly frolll1993to 1994. <br /> <br />Aid and levy highlights <br /> <br />Local govemment aid increased by 2.5 <br />percent over the 1993 certified level. <br />