Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />REQUEST FOR ACTION <br /> <br />To <br />Ci Council <br />Agenda Section <br />Communi Develo ment <br />Item Description <br />Resolution Concurring with the Local Advisory Committee's <br />Recommended Alternatives for TH169 <br /> <br />Meeting Date <br />une 18, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br />Administrator <br /> <br />Action Requested <br />Consider adoption of attached Resolution concurring with the Local Advisory Committee (LAC) <br />recommendation for selected alternatives on TH 169. <br /> <br />Background/Discussion <br />MnDOT and their consultant, SRF Group, presented their preliminary concepts for TH 169 to the <br />elected officials on May 7, 2007. On Thursday, May 17, Z007, they held six focused group meetings <br />during the day and a public open house in the evening. As the City Council will recall, the only <br />intersection that had real options for the type of interchange to be analyzed was Main Street at TH 169. <br />The two options presented were a folded diamond with a collector-distributor road (Concept B.CZ.) and <br />a single point interchange with a braided ramp (B.C3.). The vast majority of those in attendance at the <br />focused group meetings and the open house favored B.CZ., the folded diamond and collector-distributor <br />road. The reasons for this preference varied by group. Some of the specific comments were as follows: <br /> <br />. Guardian Angels preferred B.CZ. as they felt their residents would find it easier to cross the <br />highway to access Wal-Mart and other commercial businesses. <br />. Great River Energy preferred B.CZ. as it provides better access to their property, once their <br />access on TH 169 is removed. <br />. The Elk River Citizens' Group preferred B.C2. because they felt it provided a better <br />opportunity for access and redevelopment of the northeast quadrant of the intersection. <br />. The Chamber of Commerce meeting - comments were received from representatives of the <br />Kentucky Fried Chicken and other business owners in the area that they preferred B.CZ. as they <br />felt it provided a better link from Main Street to the commercial strip between 5'h Street and Elk <br />Hills Drive. <br />. The only negative comment received was from a woman from California who is an investor in <br />the Advanced Auto Parts Store which would likely be taken by Concept B.CZ. <br /> <br />Craig Robinson, the MnDOT Project Manger for the TH 169 Corridor, will be in attendance at this <br />evening's Council meeting to answer any questions regarding the various concepts. <br />